Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;108(3):578–584. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3484

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single channel conductance of CaV2.1 and CaV2.2 channels. (A) Average tail currents for 79 CaV2.1 traces (green trace) from a prepulse to +40 mV and 45 CaV2.2 traces from a prepulse to +80 mV (red trace). (B) Variance associated with the decay phase between successive tail currents shown in (A). (C) Mean versus variance plots for CaV2.1 (solid green symbols) and CaV2.2 (open red symbols) from the traces in (B). The data corresponding to the first 300 μs after the voltage jump were discarded. The relationship in panel C was obtained from the subsequent 10 ms after the voltage jump. Data were fitted with the expression: ν = iII2/n + νb, where ν is the variance, i is the single channel amplitude, I is the average current amplitude during the tail, n is the number of channels, and νb is the variance associated with the background noise. For these particular measurements, the fitting parameters were i = −0.42 ± 0.02 pA, n = 7747 ± 641, νb = 0.135 ± 0.08 nA2 for CaV2.1; and i = −0.34 ± 0.01 pA, n = 4238 ± 138, and νb = 0.015 ± 0.002 nA2 for CaV2.2. (D) The current voltage relationship from the estimated single channel currents for CaV2.1 (green solid symbols, 4 cells) and CaV2.2 currents (red open symbols, 7 cells). For CaV2.1, the data taken at −60 and −50 mV, and at −40 and −30 mV were pooled, thus each data point represents the average of at least four experiments. The continuous lines were generated using a GHK curve for a divalent cation assuming a reversal potential of +80 mV for both channels.