Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;106(1):86–93. doi: 10.1111/cas.12560

Table 2.

Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS)

Characteristics Patient Number (n = 216) (%) Median OS Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value
Age, (years)
 Age <35 25 (11.6) 1 0.898
 Age ≥35 191 (88.4) 1.063 0.419–2.696
Performance status
 ECOG 0–1 213 (98.6) 1 0.048
 ECOG 2 3 (1.4) 3.754 0.904–12.588
Pathologic characteristics
 Invasive ductal carcinoma 206 (95.4) 1 0.008
Others* 10 (4.6) 3.684 1.312–10.341
Initial clinical stage
 Operable (IIA, IIB, IIIA) 155 (71.8) 1 0.030
 Inoperable (IIIB, IIIC) 61 (28.2) 2.283 1.074–4.242
Receptor status
ER
  Positive 99 (45.8) 1 0.049
  Negative 117 (54.2) 2.081 0.996–3.189
PR
  Positive 73 (33.8) 1 0.258
  Negative 143 (66.2) 1.542 0.754–2.832
HER2
 Positive 67 (31.0) 1 0.730
 Negative 149 (69.0) 1.117 0.697–2.177
Triple negative phenotype
 Non triple negative 148 (68.5) 1 0.033
 Triple negative 68 (31.5) 1.995 1.004–3.447
ABCB1 C3435T
 CC + CT 185 (85.6) 1 0.024
 TT 31 (14.4) 0.223 0.054–0.972
ABCB1 G2677T/A
 GG 38 (17.6) 1 0.566
 Non-GG 178 (82.4) 1.168 0.543–2.510
ABCB1 C1236T
 CC + CT 136 (63.0) 1 0.126
 TT 80 (37.0) 0.688 0.335–1.256
Type of surgery
 Breast conserving 87 (40.3) 1 0.036
 Mastectomy 129 (59.7) 2.083 1.074–4.022
Menopausal status
 Pre-menopause 146 (67.6) 1 0.244
 Post-menopause 70 (32.4) 1.323 0.724–2.419

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.

Hazard ratio was calculated by Cox's proportional hazard model. If the hazard ratio is >1, the hazard ratio can be thought of as the average increased risk of death compared with the reference group (upper line).

*

Among the 10 patients, 7 had invasive lobular carcinomas, 3 medullary carcinomas and 1 tubular carcinoma.