Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;106(1):102–107. doi: 10.1111/cas.12575

Table 2.

Expression of ganglioside GM2 in mesothelioma patient samples

Patient ID Staining frequency, % Staining intensity Tissue type Age, years Sex Stage
#1 0 0 Biphasic 58 M II
#2 30 2 Biphasic 69 M I
#3 0 0 Meso 53 M IV
#4 0 0 Meso 57 F III
#5 30 3 Meso 73 M NR
#6 0 0 Biphasic 52 M III
#7 0 0 Biphasic 71 M IV
#8 80 2 Biphasic 50 M IV
#9 30 1 Meso 65 M III
#10 0 0 Meso 71 M IIA
#11 0 0 Desmoplastic 81 M NR
#12 50 3 Meso 66 M II
#13 0 0 Meso 86 M NR
#14 100 2 Desmoplastic 55 M I
#15 0 0 Desmoplastic 63 NR I
#16 90 1 Epithelial 61 M IV
#17 10 1 Meso 68 M III
#18 40 3 Biphasic 62 M III
#19 80 3 Desmoplastic 57 M NR
#20 100 3 Meso 69 M II
#21 100 1 Biphasic + desmoplastic 68 M III
#22 100 3 NR 65 M NR
#23 50 3 Meso 69 M II
#24 20 2 Meso 57 F III
#25 0 0 Biphasic 50 M IV
#26 0 0 Epithelial 81 M NR

Criteria for staining intensity: 0, negative; 1, faint; 2, moderate; 3, strong. F, female; M, male; Meso, unclassified mesothelioma; NR, not reported.