Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;105(2):e31–e45. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302293

TABLE 1—

Harms, Benefits, and Regrets Associated With Participation in Sensitive Research: Summary of Adolescent and Adult Studies Conducted From 1997 to 2013

Study Type of Violence Assessed Harms Benefits Regrets Do Victims or Nonvictims Report More Harms, Benefits, or Regrets? Do Perpetrators or Nonperpetrators Report More Harms, Benefits, or Regrets? Which Gender Reports More Harms, Benefits, or Regrets? Do Younger Or Older Participants Report More Harms, Benefits, or Regrets?
Studies among adolescents
Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al.26 (2006) Physical and sexual abuse 2.5%–7.5% upset NR NR Physical and sexual abuse victims reported being upset NR Female participants reported interest NR
Zajac et al.33 (2011) Physical assault and abuse, sexual assault, witnessed community and parental violence 5.7% distressed; 0.2% remained upset; 0.1% requested counseling (baseline); attrition rate: 29% (12-month follow-up) NR NR Physical and sexual abuse victims reported distress NR Female participants reported distress NR
Priebe et al.35 (2010) Sexual abuse 17.4% reported unpleasant feelings; 9.7% said that such questions should not be asked; 11% said that such questions can have an unfortunate impact; 17.7% said that the information collected was too private NR NR Sexual abuse victims reported discomfort Authors did not report on perpetrators’ risk of harm separately from victims’ risk of harm NR NR
Ybarra et al.36 (2009) Verbal, physical, and sexual abuse 23% upset (baseline); 77% of the participants did not complete the survey and 70% did complete the survey (13-month follow-up) NR NR No differences with respect to participants’ reports of being upset No differences with respect to participants’ reports of being upset Female participants reported being upset Younger participants reported being upset
Studies among adults
Black et al.11 (2006) Family and sexual violence, IPV Subgroup 1a: 15.9% were upset from recalling violence; subgroup 2b: 11.4% were upset More than 95% of subgroup 1 and 92.4% of subgroup 2 believed that such questions should be asked NR No differences between subgroups 1 and 2 regarding whether such questions should be asked NR Women in subgroups 1 and 2 reported being upset;
no differences between groups in belief that such questions should be asked
NR
Carlson et al.12 (2003) Childhood physical and sexual abuse 70% reported low levels of distress; 24% were very/extremely upset; 6.6% stopped the interview because they were upset 51% reported that research participation was somewhat useful; of the 24% who were highly upset, 37% found reported that participation was somewhat useful NR Victims of higher (vs lower) levels of trauma reported being upset NR NR NR
Decker et al.13 (2011) Assessment 1: child maltreatment. Assessment 2: emotionally evocative photographs and sounds. Assessment 3: 1-week follow-up 1.3%–27.8% reported the experience as a bother; 8.9%–25.3% reported no bother All assessments: 26.6%–30.4% reported increased self-insight NR Assessment 1: victims reported the experience as a bother. Assessments 2 and 3: nonvictims reported being bothered by painful insights about others. Assessments 1 and 3: victims reported the research as helpful. All assessments: victims reported distress but also reported that the research was helpful NR NR NR
Gekoski et al.14 (2009) Experiences of secondary victimization 50% upset/distressed All gained something positive No regret NR NR NR NR
Griffin et al.15 (2003) Physical assault, rape, domestic violence Acute physical/sexual assault survivors reported that research participation was not very distressing; domestic violence survivors: 42% reported strong/very strong emotions Acute physical/sexual assault survivors reported that research participation was largely interesting 5% of acute physical/sexual assault survivors reported regret; 2% of domestic violence survivors reported regret NR NR NR NR
Kuyper et al.16 (2010) Sexual abuse 16.5% were feeling down; 7.8% were sad; 3.5% needed help 96.5% reported positive feelings NR Sexual coercion victims reported distress and a need for help but also positive feelings NR Women reported distress Younger participants reported positive feelings
Newman et al.17 (1999) Child maltreatment 7% reported increase and 3% reported decrease in unexpected upset (48 hours after follow-up) 24% reported benefits at baseline, 86% at 3–12-month follow-up, 74% 48 hours after follow-up 0.09% reported regret at 3–12-month follow-up;
no regret 48 hours after follow-up
Sexual abuse victims reported unexpected upset NR NR NR
Walker et al.18 (1997) Early childhood and adult forms of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and neglect 13% unexpectedly upset More than 25% gained something positive; 13% reported no gain 76% reported no regret;
5% reported regret
Victims of the combined types of abuse reported distress NR NR NR
DePrince and Chu20 (2008) Interpersonal abuse (type not specified) Participants’ mean personal benefit scores were greater than their mean emotional reaction and perceived drawback scores Participants’ mean personal benefit scores were greater than their mean emotional reaction and perceived drawback scores NR NR NR Men reported regret and a negative experience; women believed that the research was important Older participants reported unexpected and negative emotions but also benefits
Cook et al.21 (2011) Comparison of a control questionnaire without sensitive questions with 5 questionnaires involving increasing levels of sensitive questions (ranging from stressful events to sexually violating events) Low negative affect reported across all questionnaires Participants administered the control questionnaire reported higher levels of positive affect than those completing the other questionnaires No regrets reported across any questionnaires NR NR NR NR
Ferrier-Auerbach et al.22 (2009) Effects of trauma survey (questions on combat/war exposure) vs nontrauma survey Mean scores for sadness, tension, and unexpected upset were higher among participants who completed the trauma survey No differences between trauma and nontrauma survey in mean levels of perceived gain No differences between trauma and nontrauma survey in mean levels of regret NR NR NR NR
Sikweyiya and Jewkes23 (2012) Childhood emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, physical and sexual IPV, sexual harassment, domestic violence Some reported pain, but it was short lived and not overwhelming Majority reported positive affect No regret Victims reported that the experience was positive Authors did not report on perpetrators’ risk of harm separately from victims’ risk of harm Men reported discomfort; women reported feeling empoweredc NR
DePrince and Freyd24 (2004) Physical and sexual abuse Mean scores on a 5-point scale (neutral to distress) Most thought the research was important; importance was rated greater than distress NR All subgroups thought the research was important NR Women in subgroups 1d and 2e thought that it was a good idea to include such a measure in psychology; men in subgroup 2 reported that the questions were less distressing than daily life; women reported that the research was important for psychologists NR
Schwerdtfeger and Goff25 (2008) Child and adult abuse, rape NR Victims reported favorable reactions NR Victims of higher (vs lower) levels of abuse reported that the study was personally meaningful; no differences between groups in emotionality, insight, or discomfort NR NR NR
Carter-Visscher et al.27 (2007) Assessment 1: childhood physical and sexual abuse. Assessment 2: unrelated to childhood trauma. Assessment 3: 1-week follow-up Low levels of distress over all 3 sessions Assessment 1: 100% reported that research participation was somewhat interesting.
Assessments 2 and 3: 95% reported that participation was somewhat interesting
Assessment 1: no regret.
Assessment 2: 4% reported regret.
Assessment 3: 6% reported regret
Victims of higher (vs lower) levels of childhood physical and sexual abuse of abuse) reported that the study had an “impact”f; no differences between groups with respect to willingness to take part and benefits NR NR NR
Rojas and Kinder28 (2007) Childhood sexual abuse NR NR NR No differences between victims in anxiety, anger, or depression NR No differences in adverse effects NR
Ruzek and Zatzick29 (2000) Physical assault/abuse, rape, molestation, child neglect 12% reported unexpected upset; 32% reported negative reactions; 30% reported unwanted thoughts 95% reported that benefits outweighed costs; 75% reported positive experience 95% reported no regret No differences in combined types of abuse in negative and positive responders NR No differences in combined types of abuse in negative and positive responders Older participants reported being unexpectedly upset
Johnson and Benight30 (2003) Domestic violence 25% reported unexpected upset 45% reported positive gains 6% reported regret Domestic violence victims reported being upset NR NR NR
Newman et al.31 (2008) Various forms of family violence, sexual assault, and sexual harassment NR NR NR No differences in personal satisfaction, personal benefits, emotional reactions, perceived drawbacks, or global evaluations NR Men reported that the experience was positive NR
Savell et al.32 (2006) Childhood sexual abuse NR NR NR No differences among victims in anxiety, anger, depression, or curiosity NR NR NR
Campbell et al.34 (2010) Rape, assault 4.3% reported the experience as negative Vast majority reported positive experience NR NR NR NR NR
Edwards et al.37 (2012) Child, adolescent, and adulthood abuse, rape, or domestic violence 4.3% reported negative emotional reactions (baseline); 0% reported distress (2-month follow-up) 23.3% reported personal benefits at baseline; 19% reported personal benefits at follow-up NR Childhood psychological abuse/neglect and childhood physical abuse victims reported distress; no differences in reports of distress between sexual abuse victims and those exposed to domestic violence Perpetrators of adolescent and adulthood physical, sexual, and psychological IPV reported distress NR NR
Hlavka et al.38 (2007) Verbal, psychological, physical, and sexual childhood and adulthood abuse 44% of childhood sexual abuse victims did not complete the interview; 56% of childhood and adult victims did not complete the interview 12% of childhood sexual abuse victims completed the interview; 33% of child and adult victims completed the interview NR NR NR NR NR
Shorey et al.39 (2013) Childhood emotional, physical, and sexual abuse; relationship aggression: psychological, physical, and sexual aggression, dating violence Emotional reactions (mean = 13.53; SD = 4.51); perceived drawbacks (mean = 19.95; SD = 5.04) Personal benefits (mean = 15.01; SD = 4.66) NR No differences in personal satisfaction, personal benefits, emotional reactions, perceived drawbacks, or global evaluations among victims of childhood emotional and physical abuse, psychological and sexual abuse, and dating violence; childhood sexual abuse
victims reported negative emotional reactions and perceived drawbacks; physical aggression victims reported negative perceived drawbacks
NR NR NR
Shorey et al.40 (2011) Relationship aggression: psychological, physical, and sexual aggression, dating violence Men:
emotional reactions (mean = 15.39; SD = 3.54); perceived drawbacks (mean = 21.54; SD = 4.38)
Women:
emotional reactions (mean = 15.36; SD = 4.17); perceived drawbacks (mean = 21.61; SD = 5.41)
Men: personal benefits (mean = 12.66; SD = 3.59)
Women: personal benefits (mean = 12.52; SD = 3.77)
NR No differences in personal satisfaction, personal benefits, emotional reactions, perceived drawbacks, or global evaluations among women who experienced dating violence; female physical aggression victims perceived drawbacks; Male psychological and physical aggression victims reported personal benefits and marginally more emotional reactions Female physical aggression perpetrators reported personal benefits; female sexual aggression perpetrators reported perceived drawbacks; male psychological and physical aggression perpetrators reported personal benefits and marginally more emotional reactions; male sexual aggression nonperpetrators reported perceived drawbacks NR NR
Edwards et al.41 (2013) Childhood, adolescent, and adulthood psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, domestic violence 7.7% reported negative emotional reactions (baseline); 2.1% reported distress (2-month follow-up) NR NR NR NR NR NR

Note. IPV = intimate partner violence; NR = not reported. Studies are arranged by date in ascending order (details of all studies are presented in Tables S3 and S4). Values are the percentages of participants reporting, or mean levels of, benefit, harm, and regret (or other indicators of harm, benefit, or regret such as assessment completion). Unless specified, all reports were assessed during or immediately after study completion.

a

ICARIS-2 Injury and Control Risk Survey (a national, cross-sectional random-digit-dialing telephone survey of English- and Spanish-speaking adults).

b

SIPV pilot study (an annual telephone survey).

c

This was a qualitative study and male and female participants were not directly compared.

d

Undergraduate students.

e

Community members.

f

Impact was not defined by the authors.