Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2010 Mar 15;14(3):429–448. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2010.02.005

Table 2.

Comparison of regional endocardial (ENDO) mean absolute distance (MAD)s on synthetic data (in mm).

No constraint Wall thickness constraint Incompressibility constraint
BA A 1.08 ± 0.20 1.13 ± 0.21 1.00 ± 0.18
AL 1.10 ± 0.21 1.19 ± 0.24 1.06 ± 0.23
IL 1.09 ± 0.23 1.14 ± 0.21 0.99 ± 0.22
I 1.11 ± 0.24 1.18 ± 0.23 1.09 ± 0.23
IS 1.07 ± 0.19 1.12 ± 0.19 0.97 ± 0.17
AS 1.08 ± 0.19 1.13 ± 0.20 0.96 ± 0.18
MC A 1.09 ± 0.20 1.15 ± 0.24 0.98 ± 0.20
AL 1.12 ± 0.23 1.25 ± 0.27 1.07 ± 0.22
IL 1.12 ± 0.21 1.20 ± 0.26 1.03 ± 0.20
I 1.13 ± 0.22 1.26 ± 0.28 1.04 ± 0.22
IS 1.07 ± 0.20 1.19 ± 0.23 0.99 ± 0.19
AS 1.12 ± 0.21 1.15 ± 0.22 1.01 ± 0.20
AP A 1.11 ± 0.21 1.12 ± 0.21 1.02 ± 0.21
L 1.12 ± 0.22 1.13 ± 0.22 1.06 ± 0.23
I 1.10 ± 0.21 1.13 ± 0.23 1.05 ± 0.22
S 1.12 ± 0.19 1.14 ± 0.23 1.08 ± 0.24

BA: basal, MC: mid-cavity, AP: apical, A: anterior, AL: anterolateral, IL: inferolateral, I: inferior, IS: inferoseptal, AS: anteroseptal, L: lateral, S: septal.