Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2010 Mar 15;14(3):429–448. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2010.02.005

Table 4.

Comparison of regional endocardial (ENDO) mean absolute distance (MAD)s on real data (in mm).

No constraint Wall thickness constraint IncompressibiLity constraint
BA A 1.48 ± 0.28 1.46 ± 0.31 1.41 ± 0.28
AL 1.52 ± 0.29 1.51 ± 0.29 1.43 ± 0.29
IL 1.50 ± 0.33 1.49 ± 0.27 1.46 ± 0.31
I 1.53 ± 0.31 1.51 ± 0.29 1.44 ± 0.31
IS 1.47 ± 0.29 1.49 ± 0.30 1.40 ± 0.28
AS 1.38 ± 0.26 1.47 ± 0.27 1.39 ± 0.28
MC A 1.34 ± 0.20 1.51 ± 0.29 1.31 ± 0.21
AL 1.45 ± 0.25 1.62 ± 0.31 1.45 ± 0.25
IL 1.41 ± 0.28 1.57 ± 0.26 1.34 ± 0.24
I 1.52 ± 0.30 1.64 ± 0.31 1.45 ± 0.29
IS 1.41 ± 0.30 1.52 ± 0.27 1.35 ± 0.30
AS 1.41 ± 0.29 1.51 ± 0.25 1.31 ± 0.26
AP A 1.65 ± 0.35 1.61 ± 0.34 1.58 ± 0.34
L 1.64 ± 0.31 1.58 ± 0.34 1.50 ± 0.32
I 1.62 ± 0.27 1.56 ± 0.28 1.52 ± 0.31
S 1.59 ± 0.33 1.58 ± 0.31 1.57 ± 0.31

BA: basal, MC: mid-cavity, AP: apical, A: anterior, AL: anterolateral, IL: inferolateral, I: inferior, IS: inferoseptal, AS: anteroseptal, L: lateral, S: septal.