Table 4.

Condom use attitudes and norms: Regression models comparing baseline to each follow-up (2.5- & 5-months) within each intervention group (MI and EI)

	Minimal Intervention (1 Session)				Enhanced Intervention (2-Session)
Personal attitude about using the male condomb
	Mean	Mean Difference	p-value		Mean	Mean Difference	p-value
Baseline	4.22	-	-	Baseline	4.35	-	-
FU1	4.43	0.26	0.01	FU1	4.48	0.13	0.10
FU2	4.45	0.23	0.01	FU2	4.49	0.14	0.09
Perceived partner attitude toward male condom useb
Baseline	3.53	-	-	Baseline	3.56	-	-
FU1	3.93	0.40	<.01	FU1	3.98	0.41	<.001
FU2	3.87	0.34	0.01	FU2	3.79	0.23	0.10
Personal attitude toward female condom useb
Baseline	2.97	-	-	Baseline	3.11	-	-
FU1	3.70	0.73	<.0001	FU1	3.96	0.85	<.0001
FU2	3.39	0.43	<.001	FU2	3.56	0.45	<.001
Perceived partner attitude toward female condom useb
Baseline	2.67	-	-	Baseline	2.63	-	-
FU1	2.92	0.25	0.05	FU1	2.89	0.27	0.03
FU2	2.88	0.21	0.10	FU2	2.94	0.31	0.02
Peer norms for condom useb
Baseline	2.76	-	-	Baseline	2.72	-	-
FU1	2.94	0.18	<.0001	FU1	3.03	0.31	<.0001 *
FU2	2.93	0.17	<.001	FU2	3.01	0.28	<.0001 *

^*Significant difference in change over time between the two interventions

^bLinear regression model