Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 10;60(4):505–513. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu867

Table 2.

Comparison Between Subjects With Adequate Antibody to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Anti-HBs) Versus Those With Inadequate Anti-HBs

Feature Anti-HBs Positive (>12 mIU/mL) (n = 123) Anti-HBs Negative (≤12 mIU/mL) (n = 36) P Valuea
Age at visit, y, average ± SD 47 ± 10 51 ± 10 .04
Age at vaccination, y, average ± SD 32 ± 9 36 ± 9 .02
Time since vaccination, y, average ± SD 15 ± 5 15 ± 4 .93
Sex, female 89 (72%) 29 (81%) .32
Race, white 82 (67%) 28 (78%) .57
BMI, kg/m2 26 ± 4 27 ± 5
Handled HBV samples 62 (50%) 16 (44%) .47
HBV risk exposure score .59
 Low 16 (44%) 47 (38%)
 Intermediate 6 (17%) 30 (24%)
 High 14 (39%) 46 (37%)
Needle-stick 38 (31%) 13 (36%) .55
Mucocutaneous contact 12 (10%) 3 (8%) .83
Household HBV contact 1 (1%) 2 (6%) .16
Diabetes mellitus 5 (4%) 2 (6%) .70
Hypertension 21 (17%) 8 (22%) .48
Chronic kidney disease 1 (1%) 0 (0%) .58
Smoker, past or current 30 (24%) 3 (8%) .04
Alcohol use 97 (79%) 29 (81%) .82

Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise specified.

Abbreviations: anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen; BMI, body mass index; HBV, hepatitis B virus; SD, standard deviation.

aP values were calculated using t test for continuous variables and χ2 test for frequency or categorical variables.