Table 2.
Main effects of text modality on information recall and attitudes toward the message in people with low and high health literacy.a
Group | n | Information recall Scale range: 0-28 |
Attitudes toward the message Scale range: 1-7 |
|||
mean (SE) | 95% CI | mean (SE) | 95% CI | |||
All participants | ||||||
|
Written text | 126 | 11.97b(0.46) | 11.06-12.89 | 5.79c(0.09) | 5.62-5.96 |
|
Spoken text | 105 | 13.60 (0.52) | 12.58-14.61 | 6.15 (0.10) | 5.97-6.35 |
Low health literacy | ||||||
|
Written text | 64 | 9.12d(0.66) | 7.83-10.41 | 5.75e(0.12) | 5.51-5.99 |
|
Spoken text | 44 | 11.42 (0.79) | 9.87-12.98 | 6.20 (0.15) | 5.91-6.49 |
High health literacy | ||||||
|
Written text | 62 | 14.83 (0.66) | 13.51-16.14 | 5.83 (0.12) | 5.59-6.07 |
|
Spoken text | 61 | 15.77 (0.67) | 14.45-17.09 | 6.11 (0.13) | 5.86-6.35 |
aHigher scores indicate more recall and positive attitudes.
bDiffers significantly from spoken text in all participants (P=.02).
cDiffers significantly from spoken text in all participants (P=.01).
dDiffers significantly from spoken text in low health literacy group (P=.03).
eDiffers significantly from spoken text in low health literacy group (P=.02).