Table 4.
Differences in content presented in two tobacco groupsa.
|
|
Facebook (n=43) | Wikipedia (n=48) | YouTube (n=61) | ||||||
| H | L | P value | H | L | P value | H | L | P value | |
| Number of brands | 29 | 14 |
|
31 | 17 |
|
36 | 25 |
|
| History and culture, n (%) | 13 (46) | 3 (21) | .10 | 22 (71) | 9 (53) | .40 | 3 (8) | 3 (12) | .97 |
| Major products, n (%) | 14 (49) | 2 (14) | .01 | 20 (65) | 8 (47) | .24 | 31 (86) | 18 (72) | .30 |
| Health warnings, n (%) | 1 (3) | 1 (7) | .31 | 2 (6) | 1 (6) | .94 | 2 (6) | 1 (4) | .78 |
| Online tobacco shops, n (%) | 10 (34) | 2 (14) | .12 | 2 (6) | 0 (0) | .14 | 19 (53) | 11 (44) | .32 |
| Company websites, n (%) | 10 (34) | 2 (14) | .12 | 8 (26) | 3 (18) | .50 | 5 (14) | 0 (0) | .02 |
aGroup H (brands with high retail prices) and Group L (brands with low retail prices).