Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 16;4(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4037

Table 2.

Measures of secondary process outcomes.

Secondary process outcomes Baseline 6-8 weeks 3 months postpartum
Phase 1: quasi-experimental study



Cost-effectiveness




Women’s health service use, medication use (self-report and medical record) X X X


Women’s quality of life (For economic analysis-SF-12,SF-6D to calculate QALY) X X X


Costs related to hospital-based implementation (eg, computer access; time to manage referrals)

X

Efficiency of intervention (% of women with psychosocial assessment, referral, and care; self-report and medical record) X X X

Utility of intervention (1 question asked at the end of each CBT exercise: “This exercise was useful to me” with 4 response options of I strongly agree, I somewhat agree, I somewhat disagree, I strongly disagree; 1 question asked at the end of each CBT module: “The information in this module was useful to me” with same response options) X X

Usability of intervention (1 question asked at the end of each CBT exercise: “This exercise was clear and easy to understand” with response options; 2 questions asked at the end of each module: “The information in this module was clear and easy to understand” and “It was easy to work through the module [for example, it was easy for me to get from 1 part to the other, easy to find what I needed]” with same response options) X X

Acceptability




Web-based psychosocial assessment (1 question at end of completing ANRQ-R: “I would recommend a Web-based approach to asking about emotional health to a pregnant friend” with 4 response options of I strongly agree, I somewhat agree, I somewhat disagree, I strongly disagree) X



CBT (1 question at end of each CBT module: “I would recommend this module to a pregnant friend who was struggling with stress, depression, or anxiety” with 4 response options of I strongly agree, I somewhat agree, I somewhat disagree, I strongly disagree) X X

Overall assessment (2 open-ended questions at the end of every CBT module: “The thing I liked most about this module was...” and “The thing I liked least about this module was...”) X X
Phase 2: qualitative descriptive study



Efficiency (providers’ views of the efficiency of the intervention in facilitating referrals and care; women’s views on access to timely care)

X

Utility (providers’ views on the usefulness of the intervention in promoting mental health assessment, providing guidance on referral/treatment; aiding referral process; women’s views of how useful the modules were in meeting their needs)

X

Usability (women’s views of how easy/difficult the modules were to navigate)

X

Feasibility (providers’ views of feasibility of the integrated intervention in their setting; women’s views of the feasibility of doing the modules; Google Analytics such as % women accessing CBT within 2 weeks postassessment; % women accessing each CBT module within 1-2 weeks; % completion of all 6 CBT modules; % completion of CBT modules within 8 weeks)

X

Acceptability (providers’ views; women’s views)

X