Table 9.
Association between craniofacial variables and PDSS answers shown by binary logistic regression.
| B | S.E. | OR | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1: Straight or concave profile vs. convex profile | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 1.2-6.4 | 0.018* |
| Q4: Straight or concave profile vs. convex profile | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 1.0-5.2 | 0.040* |
| Q5: Hypertrophy tonsil size vs. normal | 1.1 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 1.0-9.0 | 0.050* |
| Q5: Large tongue size vs. normal | 1.8 | 0.5 | 5.9 | 2.2-15.6 | <0.001*** |
| Q6: Class II molar relationship vs. other molar relastionships | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 1.0-5.5 | 0.047* |
| Q7: Younger age vs. older | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.1-1.5 | 0.001*** |
| Q7: Normal and long lower face vs. short lower face | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 1.2-5.3 | 0.011* |
| Q8: Large tongue size vs. normal | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 1.0-6.8 | 0.043* |
*P<0.05; ***P<0.001
B: estimated logit coefficient; S.E.: standard error of the coefficient; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.