Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0116297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116297

Table 3. Change from Baseline at Week 12 in Fasting Lipids (Modified Intent To Treat Analysis Set.

Immediate Switch Delayed Switch
Change From Baseline 12 Weeks post-switch EFV/FTC/TDF (N = 79) ABC/3TC+EFV(N = 74) Delayed Switch to EFV/FTC/TDF a (N = 73) p-value b Diff in LSM (95% CI) c
Fasting Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)
 N 79 73 68 <.001 −0.74 (−1.00, −0.47)
 Median −0.86 0.01 −0.73
 p-value d <.001 0.45 <.001
LDL Cholesterol (mmol/L)
 N 79 73 68 <.001 −0.47 (−0.70, −0.25)
 Median −0.57 0.00 −0.61
 p-value d <.001 0.47 <.001
HDL Cholesterol (mmol/L)
 N 78 73 68 <.001 −0.15 (−0.21, −0.08)
 Median −0.13 0.04 −0.14
 p-value d <.001 0.44 <.001
Triglycerides (mmol/L)
 N 79 73 68 <.001 −0.43 (−0.75, −0.11)
 Median −0.26 0.02 −0.13
 p-value d <.001 1.00 0.063

aDelayed Switch to EFV/FTC/TDF column includes subjects who were randomized to continue ABC/3TC+EFV at baseline and had at least 1 dose of EVF/FCT/TDF after switch at Week 12.

bThe p-value for comparison between EFV/FTC/TDF and ABC/3TC +EFV at study Week 12 is from Wilcoxon rank sum test.

cThe 95% confidence interval for the difference (EFV/FTC/TDF vs. ABC/3TC+EFV) is based on normal approximation.

dThe p-value for within treatment group comparison is from Wilcoxon signed rank test.