. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 6.

Published in final edited form as: Science. 2012 May 17;337(6090):100–104. doi: 10.1126/science.1217876

Table 1.

Comparison of classical population genetic measures of sequence diversity across studies

Study	No. of genes^a	N	Sample^b	Length (Mb)	θ_π (×10^-4)	θ_W (×10^-4)
Akey (27)	132	23	EU	2.50	3.41	7.35
SeattleSNPs (28)	213	23	EU	7.26	6.81	6.36
Ahituv (29)	58	757	EU	0.13	4.32	10.11
Current study	202	500^c	EU	0.74	3.96	8.79
		11,000	EU	0.74	3.96	40.38
		500^c	SA	0.69	4.04	10.67
Akey et al.	132	24	AA	2.50	4.49	12.10
Seattle SNPs	213	24	AA	7.26	8.97	10.15
Current study	202	500^c	AA	0.70	4.89	13.78

Studies differ in the relative proportion of coding and non-coding sequences

Ancestry: EU=European, AA=African-American, SA=South Asian

Sampled to N=500