Table 3.

Bivariate associations (Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients and 95% Confidence Intervals) between perceived and objectively-measured (Geographic Information System, GIS) neighborhood barriers and individual-level diet, physical activity, and Body Mass Index (BMI). Correlations with p-values < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.

	Individual-level Characteristics
Neighborhood factors related to nutrition	Diet Quality	BMI
Perceived Neighborhood Nutrition Barriers (higher score indicates more barriers)	−0.17 (−0.28, −0.05)	0.13 (0.03, 0.23)
Perceived Total Neighborhood Barriers (higher score indicates more barriers)	−0.15 (−0.27, −0.03)	0.14 (0.03, 0.24)
GIS nutrition - density (higher score indicates better access)	−0.03 (−0.17, 0.10)	0.00 (−0.11, 0.12)
GIS nutrition - distance (higher score indicates greater distance and less access)	−0.16 (−0.29, −0.03)	−0.03 (−0.15, 0.09)
Neighborhood factors related to physical activity	Total Activity	BMI
Perceived Neighborhood Physical Activity Barriers (higher score indicates more barriers)	0.01 (−0.10, 0.11)	0.12 (0.01, 0.22)
Perceived Total Neighborhood Barriers (higher score indicates more barriers)	0.01 (−0.09, 0.12)	0.14 (0.03, 0.24)
GIS physical activity - density ((higher score indicates better access)	−0.03 (−0.14, 0.09)	0.00 (−0.11, 0.12)
GIS physical activity - distance (higher score indicates greater distance and less access)	−0.06 (−0.18, 0.05)	0.03 (−0.09, 0.15)

^**Correlations between neighborhood barriers and fruit and vegetable servings and pedometer steps not included in table, as there were no statistically significant findings.