Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117661

Table 3. Results of subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Study No Sensitivity I 2 Specificity I 2 PLR NLR AUC
Well differentiated HCC
Overall 8 0.54(0.47–0.61) 89% 0.90(0.87–0.93) 43.6% 4.88(2.99–7.97) 0.46(0.27–0.77) 0.9311
Subgroup analysis
VA 5 0.40(0.31–0.49) 87.8% 0.93(0.89–0.95) 1.2% 3.98(1.53–10.35) 0.63(0.40–1.00) 0.9705
ADC-Q 3 0.75(0.64–0.83) 53.5% 0.86(0.80–0.90) 0.3% 5.36(3.69–7.79) 0.28(0.16–0.50) 0.9035
Sensitivity analysis
Overall 6 0.68(0.60–0.76) 62.8% 0.90(0.87–0.93) 58.1% 6.35(4.08–9.88) 0.36(0.23–0.57) 0.9101
VA 3 0.60(0.48–0.72) 63.5% 0.94(0.89–0.96) 36.8% 6.96(2.45–19.76) 0.46(0.24–0.85) 0.9618
Poorly differentiated HCC
Overall 9 0.84(0.78–0.89) 38.7% 0.48(0.43–0.52) 96.4% 2.29(1.43–3.69) 0.30(0.22–0.41) 0.8513
Subgroup analysis
VA 4 0.91(0.83–0.96) 40.2% 0.25(0.20–0.30) 84.5% 1.25(1.08–1.45) 0.37(0.19–0.72) 0.6316
ADC-Q 5 0.78(0.69–0.85) 0.0% 0.82(0.77–0.87) 52.2% 4.10(2.55–6.58) 0.28(0.20–0.40) 0.7822
Sensitivity analysis
Overall 7 0.83(0.76–0.89) 53.2% 0.54(0.49–0.59) 96.7% 2.98(1.15–7.70) 0.28(0.20–0.39) 0.8630
VA 2 0.98(0.87–1.00) 0.0% 0.22(0.17–0.29) 89.1% 1.35(0.96–1.88) 0.16(0.03–0.77) /

VA, visual assessment; ADC-Q, ADC quantification; No, number of data sets; I2, corresponding inconsistency index (I2) of the pooled sensitivity and specificity; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; AUC, areas under the SROC curve. Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.