Table 2.
Trial | Experimental factors | Response | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inducer substrate | Inducer concentration (%) | HCl concentration (mM) | Time (d) | exo-PG activity (U/g) | |
1 | Apple pomace | 10 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 28.8 |
2 | Sugar beet pulp | 10 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 68.2 |
3 | Apple pomace | 40 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 57.5 |
4 | Sugar beet pulp | 40 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 104.2 |
5 | Apple pomace | 10 | 0.22 | 3.5 | 209.5 |
6 | Sugar beet pulp | 10 | 0.22 | 3.5 | 300.4 |
7 | Apple pomace | 40 | 0.22 | 3.5 | 165.5 |
8 | Sugar beet pulp | 40 | 0.22 | 3.5 | - |
9 | Apple pomace | 10 | 0.1 | 5.5 | 4.3 |
10 | Sugar beet pulp | 10 | 0.1 | 5.5 | 12.5 |
11 | Apple pomace | 40 | 0.1 | 5.5 | 38.1 |
12 | Sugar beet pulp | 40 | 0.1 | 5.5 | 88.8 |
13 | Apple pomace | 10 | 0.22 | 5.5 | 91.7 |
14 | Sugar beet pulp | 10 | 0.22 | 5.5 | 374.5 |
15 | Apple pomace | 40 | 0.22 | 5.5 | 225.2 |
16 | Sugar beet pulp | 40 | 0.22 | 5.5 | - |
17 – 18* | Apple pomace | 25 | 0.16 | 4.5 | 118.2 ± 5.4 |
19 – 20* | Sugar beet pulp | 25 | 0.16 | 4.5 | 277.5 ± 1.7 |
*The standard variation between the center point repetitions was below 5%.