Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 17;20(1):e94–e102. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19958

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A) Image of static load test showing the application of the load onto the implant-prosthetic abutment. B&C) Optical microscope images of condition of a Group MP abutment pre- and post-loading. No differences were registered at the implant-abutment union. D) Image of Group MP abutment showing the methacrylate fracture at the interface with the machined titanium base.