Table 3.
Exoskeleton design features | Factor 1 (Technology characteristics) | Factor 2 (Functional activities) |
---|---|---|
Purchase cost | 0.778 | |
Repair and maintenance cost | 0.758 | |
Comfort | 0.701 | -0.128 |
Ease of putting on and taking off the device | 0.694 | |
Minimizes risk of falling | 0.659 | -0.107 |
Amount of energy needed for use | 0.659 | |
Length of training to become proficient | 0.509 | |
Overall appearance | 0.375 | -0.107 |
Ability to climb stairs | -0.212 | -0.855 |
Ability to carry out daily tasks while standing | -0.757 | |
Ability to use to get in and out of a car | -0.731 | |
Ability to walk on uneven surfaces | 0.110 | -0.672 |
Walking speed | -0.573 | |
Ability to toilet | 0.142 | -0.495 |
Portability of the device | 0.395 | -0.471 |
Range of battery life | 0.310 | -0.459 |
Ability to use without arm crutches | 0.171 | -0.419 |
Associations (i.e. loadings) of individual design features and the two factors (i.e. categories) are revealed through exploratory factor analysis. Higher numbers indicate a stronger association between the design feature (variable) and the factor, where > .71 are considered excellent, >.63 are considered very good, >.55 are considered good, and > .45 are considered fair. Values between -0.100 and 0.100 have been excluded from this table. These loadings allow the design features to be grouped into two major categories, where Factor 1 represents Technology Characteristics and Factor 2 represents Functional Activities. Italicized loading values indicate the factor which the design feature was grouped into.