Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 23;15:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-15-7

Table 3.

Scenarios of agreement in the validation of self-reported stroke

Scenario Prevalence (self-report) Prevalence (hospital-recorded) Sensitivity Positive predictive value Kappa (95% CI) Prevalence index
1921-26 cohort
A* 6.6% 2.1% 78.1% 24.5% 0.35 (0.25 to 0.46) 0.91
B 6.6% 3.1% 86.0% 41.2% 0.54 (0.44 to 0.63) 0.90
C 6.6% 3.4% 86.8% 45.1% 0.57 (0.48 to 0.67) 0.90
D 6.6% 4.0% 88.7% 53.9% 0.65 (0.57 to 0.74) 0.89
1946-52 cohort
A* 1.2% 0.7% 78.6% 44.0% 0.56 (0.37 to 0.75) 0.98
B 1.2% 0.7% 80.0% 48.0% 0.60 (0.42 to 0.78) 0.98

*Scenario A: Agreement between self-reported and hospital-recorded stroke.

Scenario B: Hospital comparison group includes TIA and sequelae of cerebrovascular disease diagnoses, and hospital–recorded strokes occurring before the period of interest.

Scenario C: Compares self-reported stroke with any hospital-recorded cerebrovascular disease.

§Scenario D: Scenario C, plus includes women as having had a possible stroke if they provided comments on the stroke event in the questionnaire.