Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;2015:806983. doi: 10.1155/2015/806983

Table 10.

Ranking of the alternatives by utilizing different λ in GHFSWG.

λ s(h 1) s(h 2) s(h 3) s(h 4) The final ranking
λ = 1 0.434 0.489 0.422 0.522 s(h 4) > s(h 2) > s(h 1) > s(h 3)
λ = 2 0.409 0.470 0.385 0.462 s(h 2) > s(h 4) > s(h 1) > s(h 3)
λ = 5 0.366 0.437 0.309 0.378 s(h 2) > s(h 4) > s(h 1) > s(h 3)
λ = 10 0.334 0.399 0.255 0.318 s(h 2) > s(h 1) > s(h 4) > s(h 3)