Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;2015:806983. doi: 10.1155/2015/806983

Table 7.

Ranking of the alternatives by utilizing k(t) = −log⁡(t).

s(μ 1) s(μ 2) s(μ 3) s(μ 4) Ranking
HFSWA 0.683 0.597 0.583 0.695 s(h 4) > s(h 1) > s(h 2) > s(h 3)
HFSWG 0.434 0.489 0.422 0.522 s(h 4) > s(h 2) > s(h 1) > s(h 3)