Skip to main content
PMC home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2015 Jan 22;2015:508071. doi: 10.1155/2015/508071

Effects of Mentha suaveolens Essential Oil on Chlamydia trachomatis

Rosa Sessa 1,*, Marisa Di Pietro 1, Fiorenzo De Santis 1, Simone Filardo 1, Rino Ragno 2, Letizia Angiolella 1
PMCID: PMC4320923  PMID: 25685793

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis, the most common cause of sexually transmitted bacterial infection worldwide, has a unique biphasic developmental cycle alternating between the infectious elementary body and the replicative reticulate body. C. trachomatis is responsible for severe reproductive complications including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and obstructive infertility. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether Mentha suaveolens essential oil (EOMS) can be considered as a promising candidate for preventing C. trachomatis infection. Specifically, we investigated the in vitro effects of EOMS towards C. trachomatis analysing the different phases of chlamydial developmental cycle. Our results demonstrated that EOMS was effective towards C. trachomatis, whereby it not only inactivated infectious elementary bodies but also inhibited chlamydial replication. Our study also revealed the effectiveness of EOMS, in combination with erythromycin, towards C. trachomatis with a substantial reduction in the minimum effect dose of antibiotic. In conclusion, EOMS treatment may represent a preventative strategy since it may reduce C. trachomatis transmission in the population and, thereby, reduce the number of new chlamydial infections and risk of developing of severe sequelae.

1. Introduction

Chlamydia trachomatis, an obligate intracellular pathogen, is the leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases in the world with an estimated over 105 million new cases every year [1]. It manifests as cervicitis, salpingitis, and endometritis and can be transmitted to infants during delivery resulting in neonatal conjunctivitis and pneumonitis [2]. Chlamydial genital infections have also been reported to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission [2, 3] and influence the development of human papilloma virus induced adenocarcinoma [2, 4].

A major concern with chlamydial genital infections is that approximately 80% of women are asymptomatic, thus resulting in a reservoir for onwards transmission in the population. Consequently, C. trachomatis untreated infections can progress leading to chronic severe sequelae, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and obstructive infertility [2].

Similarly to C. trachomatis, Chlamydia pneumoniae has also been associated with several chronic diseases such as atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, asthma, and more recently osteoporosis-related bone loss [5–7].

Several studies have suggested that the development of Chlamydiae associated chronic diseases may be related to the persistent form that can arise under stressful growth conditions imposed, for example, by antibiotic treatment and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) coinfection [8, 9].

C. trachomatis has an intriguing and unique biphasic developmental cycle alternating between the extracellular, infectious, metabolically inactive elementary body (EB) and the intracellular, noninfectious, metabolically active reticulate body (RB). Apart from EB and RB, a third nonreplicating and noninfectious form, called persistent form, has been described to be responsible for establishing chronic infections since they are able to evade the host immune response and are more difficult to eradicate by antibiotics [8].

The existence of C. trachomatis EBs and RBs as well as the persistent forms makes the treatment of infection a challenge. Beta-lactam antibiotics, commonly used against bacterial infections because they are able to inhibit the peptidoglycan synthesis, are ineffective towards C. trachomatis for the lack of a classical peptidoglycan [10], and some of them such as penicillin G are even able to induce persistent forms [8, 9].

In contrast, macrolides including azithromycin and erythromycin appear to be effective against C. trachomatis [11] although several clinical treatment failures have been reported [12, 13]. The major cause for C. trachomatis therapeutic failure may be chlamydial resistance to antibiotic [14–16]. In addition, the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance in C. trachomatis could be more complex since it may be also related to the development of persistent forms [17].

Thus, given the impact of asymptomatic chlamydial infections on reproductive outcomes as well as the emerging resistance of C. trachomatis to antibiotics and the risk of developing persistent forms, preventing new infections becomes a priority.

Recently, a great interest in natural products as alternative treatment for preventing infections has been raised in view of their extensive biological effects including anticancer, antioxidant, and other pharmacological activities [18]. Essential oils derived from aromatic medicinal plants, such as Mentha species, have been explored and gained prominence; in previous studies, it has been demonstrated that Mentha suaveolens essential oil was effective against yeasts, fungi, and viruses [19–24].

Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate whether Mentha suaveolens essential oil can be considered as a promising candidate for preventing C. trachomatis genital infections. Specifically, we investigated the in vitro effects of Mentha suaveolens essential oil on the lymphogranuloma venereum strain of C. trachomatis analysing the different phases of chlamydial developmental cycle.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Essential Oil

Mentha suaveolens essential oil (EOMS) was obtained from wild-type plants grown in Tarquinia forests (Rome, Italy) and was extracted by 4 h hydrodistillation of the aerial parts using a Clevenger-type apparatus as previously described by Angiolella et al. [21].

2.2. Propagation and Titration of C. trachomatis

C. trachomatis lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) serovar L2 (ATCC-VR-902B) was propagated in HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) grown in 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells/well) in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Euroclone, Italy) high glucose supplemented with 10% heat inactivated foetal calf serum (FCS, Euroclone, Italy). Infected HeLa cells were centrifuged at 900 ×g for 60 min at 37°C. The supernatant was removed and replaced with DMEM high glucose supplemented with 10% FCS, 10 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and 1 μg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). After 48 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, infected cells were harvested in sucrose-phosphate-glutamate buffer (SPG buffer) (0.2 M sucrose, 3.8 mM KH2PO4, 6.7 mM Na2HPO4, and 5.5 mM glutamic acid at pH 7.4) and vortexed with sterile glass beads for 2–5 min. After removal of cell debris by centrifugation at 250 ×g for 10 min, the supernatant was centrifugated at 20,000 ×g and 4°C for 20 min and the pellet, resuspended in SPG buffer, was stored at −70°C.

The infectious titre (inclusion-forming units (IFU)/mL) was assessed by immunofluorescence assay. Briefly, HeLa cells (2.0 × 105 cells/well), grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates, were infected with tenfold serial dilutions of chlamydial EBs suspension, incubated for 48 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, fixed with methanol, and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated monoclonal (FITC) antibody against C. trachomatis MOMP (Micro-Trak Chlamydia trachomatis Culture Confirmation Test, Trinity Biotech, USA). The total number of IFUs was enumerated by counting all microscope fields using a fluorescence microscope (400x magnification).

2.3. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxicity of EOMS was determined on HeLa cells using the MTT (methylthiazolyldipheniltetrazolium bromide) assay. Briefly, 1.0 × 104 HeLa cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated, at 37°C and 5% CO2, with twofold serial dilutions of EOMS (2 mg/mL–16 μg/mL in DMEM) for 1 or 48 h (the cells incubated for 1 h were washed with PBS and further incubated in fresh medium). After 48 h incubation, HeLa cells were incubated with MTT reagent (5 mg/mL) for 4 h. Afterwards, the medium was removed and formazan crystals were dissolved with the MTT solubilisation solution (0.1 N HCl in isopropanol). The amount of formazan produced was detected by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm (ELISA reader). CC50 was defined as the product concentration required for reducing the cell viability by 50%.

2.4. Effect of EOMS towards Chlamydial EBs

Chlamydial EBs at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.05 IFU/cell were incubated in the presence or absence of EOMS for 30, 60, or 120 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. After the incubation period, the mixture containing chlamydial EBs and EOMS was diluted 1 : 100 in DMEM and used to infect HeLa cell monolayers grown in 24-well plates (2.0 × 105 cells/well), as previously described. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cycloheximide-free medium, infected and treated cells were recovered to determine the infectivity yield and the IC50 value.

2.5. Effect of EOMS on C. trachomatis Replication

HeLa cell monolayers (2.0 × 105 cells/well) grown in 24-well plates were infected with C. trachomatis (MOI 0.05) by centrifugation at 900 ×g at 37°C for 1 h. After removal of chlamydial inoculum, infected HeLa cells were incubated with twofold serial dilutions of EOMS prepared in culture medium. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cycloheximide-free medium, infected and treated cells were recovered to determine the infectivity yield and the IC50 value.

2.6. Effect of EOMS on Different Phases of Chlamydial Infection

EOMS was added during different phases of C. trachomatis infection as follows: (A) chlamydial EBs suspension was preincubated with EOMS for 2 h; (B) HeLa cells, grown in 24-well plates (2.0 × 105 cells/well), were preincubated with EOMS for 2 h; (C) EOMS was added during C. trachomatis infection; and (D) EOMS was added during the 48 h postinfection period.

In all conditions, cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cycloheximide-free medium. After 48 h of incubation, infected and treated cells were recovered to determine the infectivity yield and the IC50 value.

2.7. Effect of EOMS in Combination with Erythromycin

HeLa cell monolayers (2.0 × 105 cells/well) grown in 24-well plates were infected with C. trachomatis (MOI 0.05) by centrifugation at 900 ×g at 37°C for 1 h. After removal of chlamydial inoculum, infected HeLa cells were incubated with different concentrations of erythromycin (0.008–0.5 μg/mL). After 48 h incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cycloheximide-free medium, infected and treated cells were recovered and used to determine the infectivity yield and the IC50 value.

The combined effect between EOMS and erythromycin was assessed after infection of HeLa cells with C. trachomatis (MOI 0.05) as above described. Following removal of chlamydial inoculum, HeLa cells monolayers were treated with EOMS and subinhibitory doses of erythromycin. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cycloheximide-free medium, infected and treated cells were recovered to determine the infectivity yield and the IC50 value.

2.8. Assessment of Infectivity Yield

Infectivity yield was determined by the development of inclusions after passage to fresh HeLa cell monolayers. Briefly, cell monolayers were disrupted and repassed onto fresh HeLa cell monolayers grown on glass coverslips in 24 well-plates. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, the total number of C. trachomatis IFUs was counted by immunofluorescence assay.

The product concentration required to reduce chlamydial infectivity yield by 50% was defined as IC50.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates from three independent experiments. Comparison of means was performed by using a two-tailed t-test for independent samples. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cytotoxicity of EOMS

In order to assess the cytotoxic effect of EOMS, HeLa cell monolayers were incubated with increasing concentrations of essential oil for 1 h or 48 h and, then, cell viability was measured by the MTT assay.

No significant cytotoxicity was observed following 1 h exposure of EOMS up to 500 μg/mL (Figure 1). The CC50 of EOMS was 1000 μg/mL.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Cytotoxic effect of EOMS on HeLa cells. HeLa cell monolayers were treated with different concentrations of EOMS for 1 h or 48 h and, then, cell viability was determined by MTT assay.

Following 48 h exposure of EOMS, a cytotoxic effect to HeLa cell monolayers was observed at a concentration of 125 μg/mL (CC50).

3.2. Effect of EOMS on Chlamydial EBs

In order to determine whether EOMS was active against chlamydial EBs, twofold serial dilutions of essential oil (from 1000 μg/mL to 125 μg/mL) were incubated with the EBs suspension for different periods. As shown in Figure 2, exposure of chlamydial EBs to concentrations of EOMS greater than 125 μg/mL resulted in the inhibition of chlamydial infection as evidenced by a significant reduction in infectivity yield after 60 min of treatment as compared to infected cells alone (P = 0.04). A more marked reduction in infectivity yield was observed when the chlamydial EBs suspension was treated with 500 μg/mL EOMS for 30, 60, or 120 min as compared to infected cells alone (P = 0.004; P = 0.003; and P = 0.003); a higher reduction in infectivity yield was observed in infected and treated cells for 60 or 120 min as compared to infected and treated cells for 30 min (30 min versus 60 min, P = 0.01; 30 min versus 120 min, P = 0.008). Again, a higher reduction in infectivity yield was observed in infected and treated cells for 120 min as compared to infected and treated cells for 60 min (P = 0.02).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of C. trachomatis EBs by EOMS treatment. Chlamydial EBs suspensions were treated with different concentrations of EOMS for 30, 60, or 120 min and then the mixture was used to infect HeLa cell monolayers. After 48 h of incubation, treated and untreated HeLa cell monolayers were recovered to determine the chlamydial infectivity yield. * P < 0.05 versus untreated cells.

Chlamydial EBs were completely inactivated following exposure to 1000 μg/mL EOMS for 30 min (Figure 2).

The IC50 value for EOMS was 500 μg/mL after 30 min of incubation whereas it was reduced to 250 μg/mL after 60 and 120 min of incubation.

3.3. Effect of EOMS on C. trachomatis Replication

The effect of EOMS on C. trachomatis replication was evaluated by treating infected cells with increasing concentrations of essential oil. EOMS at a concentration of 32 μg/mL inhibited the chlamydial replication as evidenced by a significant reduction in infectivity yield observed in infected and treated cells as compared to infected cells alone (P = 0.002). EOMS was more effective in inhibiting C. trachomatis at a concentration of 64 μg/mL (P = 0.004). A higher inhibitory effect of EOMS on C. trachomatis was observed in cells treated with 64 μg/mL as compared to cells treated with 32 μg/mL (P = 0.025) (Figure 3). The IC50 value of EOMS was 32 μg/mL.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of C. trachomatis replication by EOMS treatment. HeLa cell monolayers were infected with C. trachomatis (MOI 0.05) and then treated with different concentrations of EOMS. After 48 h of incubation, treated and untreated HeLa cell monolayers were recovered to determine the chlamydial infectivity yield. * P < 0.05 versus untreated cells.

Interestingly, the sizes of individual chlamydial inclusions in cells infected and treated with EOMS were much smaller than those of infected cells alone, although it was not quantified. The effect of EOMS in chlamydial inclusion size reduction was dose dependent. Indeed, chlamydial inclusions from cells treated with 64 μg/mL were much smaller as compared to those from cells treated with 32 μg/mL (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Immunohistological staining of C. trachomatis infected cell monolayers in the presence or absence of EOMS. HeLa cell monolayers were infected with C. trachomatis (MOI 0.05) and incubated in the presence ((a) 16 μg/mL; (b) 32 μg/mL; and (c) 64 μg/mL) or absence of EOMS (d). After 48 h of incubation, HeLa cell monolayers were fixed, stained, and visualised by fluorescence microscopy (400x magnification). Bars: 50 μm.

Based on the best inhibitory effect towards C. trachomatis and the absence of cytotoxicity of EOMS at 64 μg/mL we used this concentration to determine more specifically which phase of chlamydial infection was impaired by the essential oil. The treatment conditions included pretreatment of chlamydial EBs suspension for 2 h, the pretreatment of host cells for 2 h, the coincubation of EOMS and C. trachomatis with host cells, and the addition of EOMS during the C. trachomatis postinfection period of 48 h. As shown in Figure 5, a significant reduction in infectivity yield was observed when EOMS was added during the 48 h postinfection phase as compared to infected cells alone (P = 0.002).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of EOMS (64 μg/mL) on different phases of C. trachomatis infection. (A) chlamydial EBs pretreatment with EOMS for 2 h. (B) HeLa cell monolayer pretreatment with EOMS for 2 h. (C) Addition of EOMS during chlamydial infection. (D) Addition of EOMS during postinfection period. After 48 h of incubation, treated and untreated HeLa cell monolayers were recovered to determine the chlamydial infectivity yield. * P < 0.05 versus untreated cells.

3.4. Effect of EOMS in Combination with Erythromycin

We first determined the activity of erythromycin towards C. trachomatis by treating infected cells with different concentrations of antibiotic (0.008–0.5 μg/mL) for 48 h. The IC50 of the erythromycin was 0.030 μg/mL, and at a concentration of 0.064 μg/mL the chlamydial replication was completely inhibited.

Next, we evaluated the effects of EOMS in combination with erythromycin towards C. trachomatis by treating infected cells with 64 μg/mL EOMS and subinhibitory doses of erythromycin. Erythromycin in combination with EOMS completely inhibited C. trachomatis replication at a concentration of 0.016 μg/mL with IC50 of 0.007 μg/mL.

4. Discussion

C. trachomatis is a significant public health problem because of the impact of asymptomatic infections on reproductive outcomes, the transmission of other sexually acquired agents, and the severe sequelae associated with the persistent forms. Indeed, in women, up to 40% of C. trachomatis untreated infections progress to serious complications [2], and there is also the evidence that an existing chlamydial genital infection may increase the risk of acquiring HSV-2 [25] and HIV [2, 3]. In particular, in the presence of sexually transmitted diseases including C. trachomatis infection the risk of HIV transmission may increase by three- to tenfold [26].

Lastly, C. trachomatis persistent forms are of particular clinical importance considering that they seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of adverse reproductive consequences of C. trachomatis infection since they may act as chronic stimuli leading to chronic inflammatory state and subsequent tissue damage [27].

In our study, we evaluated the activity of EOMS towards C. trachomatis in view of its safety and beneficial effect in topical treatment of vaginal candidiasis [28]. In particular, we investigated the aggressive LGV serovar of C. trachomatis known for its increasing incidence in Western Europe and North America [29, 30] and for its association with increased risk of HIV acquisition in several underdeveloped countries [31, 32].

Our results demonstrated that EOMS was not cytotoxic to epithelial cell line as was also evidenced in other studies [23, 28] and it was effective against C. trachomatis. Specifically, EOMS had a direct effect on chlamydial infectious EBs as shown by the significant reduction in infectivity yield observed after treatment of EBs with essential oil (IC50: 500 μg/mL, 30 min). It is likely that EOMS inactivates EBs by disrupting lipid bilayers or by interfering with chlamydial components, which are essential for the entry into host cells, a fundamental stage in chlamydial infection cycle and pathogenesis.

In addition to inhibiting chlamydial EBs, EOMS was also effective after entry of C. trachomatis into host cells as shown by the significant reduction in infectivity yield after 48 h of treatment (IC50: 32 μg/mL). Such effect was also demonstrated by the decreased size of individual chlamydial inclusions observed in infected and treated cells as compared to infected cells alone. The inhibitory effect of EOMS on chlamydial replication was further corroborated by the observation that early stages of C. trachomatis developmental cycle including the adhesion and the entry into host cell were not impaired by EOMS treatment.

As known, the management and control of C. trachomatis infection become increasingly challenging. Currently, erythromycin and azithromycin are recommended for treating C. trachomatis infections although these drugs have been shown to have side effects [33, 34]. In this regard, a particularly interesting finding of our study was the effectiveness of EOMS in combination with erythromycin against C. trachomatis with a considerable fourfold reduction in the minimum effective dose of antibiotic. The combination of EOMS antibiotic has shed light on a novel approach in controlling C. trachomatis infection and in decreasing the adverse effects of antibiotics. Limiting the effective dose of antibiotic reduces also the costs in financial terms since the combination of existing drugs require less costs than developing new drugs.

Thus, EOMS is effective towards C. trachomatis by several ways. First, EOMS inactivates C. trachomatis EBs supposedly preventing the entry in host cell, key phase for establishing the infection. Second, EOMS inhibits C. trachomatis replication reducing the infectivity and hence the progression of infection. Third, EOMS in combination with erythromycin inhibits C. trachomatis replication reducing the minimum effective dose of the antibiotic.

5. Conclusion

The present study revealed, for the first time, that EOMS was effective towards C. trachomatis by inactivating infectious elementary bodies and inhibiting chlamydial replication. These findings suggest that EOMS treatment may represent a preventative strategy for reducing C. trachomatis transmission in the population, the number of new chlamydial infections, and the risk of developing severe sequelae, even if further studies on the activity of EOMS towards vaginal bacterial flora and other sexually acquired agents are needed.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from Center for Social Disease Research, “Sapienza” University of Rome, to Rosa Sessa.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exists.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global Incidence and Prevalence of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections Overview and Estimates. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75181/1/9789241503839_eng.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shaw K., Coleman D., O’Sullivan M., Stephens N. Public health policies and management strategies for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:55–65. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhattar S., Bhalla P., Chadha S., Tripathi R., Kaur R., Sardana K. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in HIV-infected women: need for screening by a sensitive and specific test. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2013:6. doi: 10.1155/2013/960769.960769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Silva J., Cerqueira F., Medeiros R. Chlamydia trachomatis infection: implications for HPV status and cervical cancer. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014;289(4):715–723. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.di Pietro M., Schiavoni G., Sessa V., Pallotta F., Costanzo G., Sessa R. Chlamydia pneumoniae and osteoporosis-associated bone loss: a new risk factor? Osteoporosis International. 2013;24(5):1677–1682. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2217-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Di Pietro M., Filardo S., De Santis F., Sessa R. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in atherosclerotic lesion development through oxidative stress: a brief overview. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013;14(7):15105–15120. doi: 10.3390/ijms140715105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Orrskog S., Medin E., Tsolova S., Semenza J. C. Causal inference regarding infectious aetiology of chronic conditions: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068861.e68861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wyrick P. B. Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: an overview. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;201(2):S88–S95. doi: 10.1086/652394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.di Pietro M., Tramonti A., de Santis F., et al. Analysis of gene expression in penicillin G induced persistence of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2012;26(2):277–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Di Pietro M., de Santis F., de Biase D., Sessa R. The elusive but pathogenic peptidoglycan of Chlamydiae . European Journal of Inflammation. 2013;11(1):257–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hammerschlag M. R., Kohlhoff S. A. Treatment of chlamydial infections. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2012;13(4):545–552. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.658776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schillinger J. A., Kissinger P., Calvet H., et al. Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women:a randomized, controlled trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2003;30(1):49–56. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hocking J. S., Vodstrcil L. A., Huston W. M., et al. A cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure in women: a study protocol. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2013;13(1, article 379) doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Somani J., Bhullar V. B., Workowski K. A., Farshy C. E., Black C. M. Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2000;181(4):1421–1427. doi: 10.1086/315372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Misyurina O. Y., Chipitsyna E. V., Finashutina Y. P., et al. Mutations in a 23S rRNA gene of Chlamydia trachomatis associated with resistance to macrolides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(4):1347–1349. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1347-1349.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhengraj A. R., Vardhan H., Srivastava P., Salhan S., Mittal A. Decreased susceptibility to azithromycin and doxycycline in clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis obtained from recurrently infected female patients in India. Chemotherapy. 2010;56(5):371–377. doi: 10.1159/000314998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dreses-Werringloer U., Padubrin I., Zeidler H., Köhler L. Effects of azithromycin and rifampin on Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(11):3001–3008. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3001-3008.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ding W., Gu J., Cao L., et al. Traditional Chinese herbs as chemical resource library for drug discovery of anti-infective and anti-inflammatory. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2014;155(1):589–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.05.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oumzil H., Ghoulami S., Rhajaoui M., et al. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of essential oils of Mentha suaveolens . Phytotherapy Research. 2002;16(8):727–731. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mimica-Dukić N., Božin B., Soković M., Mihajlović B., Matavulj M. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of three Mentha species essential oils. Planta Medica. 2003;69(5):413–419. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Angiolella L., Vavala E., Sivric S., Diodata D. F., Ragno R. In vitro activity of Mentha suaveolens essential oil against Cryptococcus neoformans and dermatophytes. International Journal of Essential Oil Therapeutics. 2010;4(1-2):35–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Civitelli L., Panella S., Marcocci M. E., et al. In vitro inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 1 replication by Mentha suaveolens essential oil and its main component piperitenone oxide. Phytomedicine. 2014;21(6):857–865. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stringaro A., Vavala E., Colone M., et al. Effects of Mentha suaveolens essential oil alone or in combination with other drugs in Candida albicans . Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;2014:9. doi: 10.1155/2014/125904.125904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Astani A., Heidary Navid M., Schnitzler P. Attachment and penetration of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus are inhibited by Melissa officinalis extract. Phytotherapy Research. 2014;28(10):1547–1552. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mastromarino P., Di Pietro M., Schiavoni G., Nardis C., Gentile M., Sessa R. Effects of vaginal lactobacilli in Chlamydia trachomatis infection. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2014;304(5-6):654–661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Silva L. C. F., Miranda A. E., Batalha R. S., et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection among HIV-infected women attending an AIDS clinic in the city of Manaus, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2012;16(4):335–338. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ness R. B., Soper D. E., Richter H. E., et al. Chlamydia antibodies, chlamydia heat shock protein, and adverse sequelae after pelvic inflammatory disease: the PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2008;35(2):129–135. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181557c25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pietrella D., Angiolella L., Vavala E., et al. Beneficial effect of Mentha suaveolens essential oil in the treatment of vaginal candidiasis assessed by real-time monitoring of infection. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;11, article 18 doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nieuwenhuis R. F., Ossewaarde J. M., Götz H. M., et al. Resurgence of lymphogranuloma venereum in Western Europe: an outbreak of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 proctitis in The Netherlands among men who have sex with men. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;39(7):996–1003. doi: 10.1086/423966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martin-Iguacel R., Llibre J. M., Nielsen H., et al. Lymphogranuloma venereum proctocolitis: a silent endemic disease in men who have sex with men in industrialised countries. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2010;29(8):917–925. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0959-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Siemer J., Theile O., Larbi Y., et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for infertility among women in Ghana, West Africa. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;78(2):323–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Detels R., Green A. M., Klausner J. D., et al. The incidence and correlates of symptomatic and asymptomatic chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in selected populations in five countries. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2011;38(6):503–509. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318206c288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases (STD) treatment guidelines. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2010;59(RR-12):79–85. http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2010/STD-Treatment-2010-RR5912.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wyrick P. B., Knight S. T. Pre-exposure of infected human endometrial epithelial cells to penicillin in vitro renders Chlamydia trachomatis refractory to azithromycin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2004;54(1):79–85. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES