TABLE 2. Summary of Analyses of Variance Performed on Trait Data.
F Values | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait Class | Trait Code | Trait | Year | Location | Genotype | Location | R2 |
Late blight resistance | LEAF | Leaf AUDPC | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 2.28‡ | 16.71* | 0.76 |
2010 | 1 & 2 | 6.64‡ | 63.68‡ | 0.74 | |||
STEM | Stem AUDPC | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 9.37‡ | 1.30 ns | 0.55 | |
2010 | 1 | 2.48* | — | 0.52 | |||
2 | 0.16 ns | — | 0.62 | ||||
Maturity | DAP1st | Days to 1st ripe fruit | 2009 | 3 | 1.88† | — | 0.49 |
4 | 4.52‡ | — | 0.69 | ||||
2010 | 3 & 4 | 7.93‡ | 135.68‡ | 0.67 | |||
DAP50 | Days to 50% ripe fruit | 2009 | 3 | 7.57‡ | — | 0.79 | |
4 | 4.74‡ | — | 0.71 | ||||
2010 | 3 | 12.40‡ | — | 0.81 | |||
4 | 7.91‡ | — | 0.72 | ||||
Yield | YLD | Yield | 2009 | 3 | 1.91‡ | — | 0.48 |
4 | 1.60* | — | 0.45 | ||||
2010 | 3 | 2.84‡ | — | 0.48 | |||
Fruit size/shape | FH | Fruit height | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 15.44‡ | 0.04 ns | 0.80 |
2010 | 3 | 18.78‡ | — | 0.86 | |||
4 | 15.12‡ | — | 0.83 | ||||
FW | Fruit width | 2009 | 3 | 5.56‡ | — | 0.73 | |
4 | 4.45‡ | — | 0.69 | ||||
2010 | 3 & 4 | 10.39‡ | 0.09 ns | 0.65 | |||
FS | Fruit shape | 2009 | 3 | 17.45‡ | — | 0.89 | |
4 | 14.32‡ | — | 0.87 | ||||
2010 | 3 & 4 | 45.16‡ | 2.42 ns | 0.88 | |||
FP | Fruit size | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 6.32‡ | 3.19 ns | 0.66 | |
2010 | 3 & 4 | 14.70‡ | 0.19 ns | 0.72 | |||
30Wt | Fruit weight | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 11.39‡ | 0.50 ns | 0.76 | |
2010 | 3 & 4 | 24.41‡ | 3.64 ns | 0.81 | |||
SW | Seed weight | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 15.95‡ | 1.69 ns | 0.80 | |
Fruit quality | Brix | oBrix | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 8.39‡ | 13.87* | 0.67 |
2010 | 3 & 4 | 7.62‡ | 70.33‡ | 0.63 | |||
pH | pH | 2009 | 3 & 4 | 1.38* | 12.17* | 0.45 | |
2010 | 3 & 4 | 3.45‡ | 6.18* | 0.45 | |||
Plant architecture | CD | Canopy density | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 3.10‡ | 0.22 ns | 0.50 |
3 | 1.89† | — | 0.50 | ||||
4 | 4.76‡ | — | 0.69 | ||||
2010 | 3 | 3.89‡ | — | 0.56 | |||
4 | 2.86‡ | — | 0.49 | ||||
HAB | Plant habit | 2009 | 1, 2, 3, 4 | 3.62‡ | 40.93‡ | 0.55 | |
2010 | 3 & 4 | 10.91‡ | 2.93 ns | 0.66 | |||
H | Plant height | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 6.41‡ | 0.01 ns | 0.66 | |
3 & 4 | 17.27‡ | 95.46‡ | 0.84 | ||||
2010 | 1 | 4.87‡ | — | 0.53 | |||
2 | 1.76† | — | 0.30 | ||||
3 & 4 | 10.52‡ | 0.66 ns | 0.65 | ||||
W | Plant width | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 4.16‡ | 1.01 ns | 0.61 | |
3 | 2.71‡ | — | 0.57 | ||||
4 | 3.09‡ | — | 0.61 | ||||
2010 | 3 & 4 | 17.71‡ | 6.40* | 0.77 | |||
1 & 2 | 6.22‡ | 37.9‡ | 0.52 | ||||
SH | Plant shape | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 2.70‡ | 1.01 ns | 0.53 | |
3 & 4 | 1.74† | 1.46 ns | 0.66 | ||||
2010 | 1 & 2 | 9.45‡ | 102.23‡ | 0.60 | |||
3 & 4 | 13.05‡ | 12.88* | 0.71 | ||||
SZ | Plant size | 2009 | 1 & 2 | 6.79‡ | 0.65 ns | 0.68 | |
3 & 4 | 11.72‡ | 112.91‡ | 0.82 | ||||
2010 | 1 | 4.57‡ | — | 0.52 | |||
2 | 1.32 ns | — | 0.25 | ||||
3 & 4 | 17.14‡ | 2.24 ns | 0.76 |
F test values and R2 values are presented for each analysis by trait, year, and location or combination of locations (see Materials and Methods). R2 indicates the fit of the data to the linear additive model for each analysis. Late blight disease resistance results are from Johnson et al. (2012). AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve; —, not included in model; ns, not significant.
P ≤ 0.05
P ≤ 0.01
P ≤ 0.001