Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2014 Jun 19;120(20):3200–3207. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28871

Table 3.

Main reasons why parents did not intend to get their Hispanic adolescent sons HPV vaccine in the next year, 2010–2012 (n=1751)

Parents’ Preferred Language
Total
n (weighted %)
English
n (weighted %)
Spanish
n (weighted %)
p
Lack of knowledge 358 (23.6) 247 (19.9) 111 (32.9) 0.0030
Vaccination not needed or not necessary 392 (22.5) 329 (27.2) 61 (10.6) <0.0001
Did not receive provider recommendation 408 (22.0) 294 (17.7) 114 (32.2) 0.0004
Son not sexually active 185 (9.0) 160 (11.2) 25 (3.5) 0.0002
Child is male 138 (6.0) 123 (7.5) 14 (2.2) 0.0016
Vaccine safety concern/side effects 104 (5.8) 89 (6.8) 15 (3.1) 0.0405
Costs 40 (3.8) 20 (3.0) 20 (5.9) 0.2470
Son not appropriate age 70 (3.5) 53 (3.4) 17 (3.9) 0.7606
Not a school requirement 34 (2.6) 22 (2.6) 12 (2.5) 0.9215

Note. Table includes parents of unvaccinated sons who indicated they were “not likely at all,” “not too likely,” or “not sure/don’t know” about getting their sons HPV vaccine in the next year. Table does not include reasons that were reported by less than 2.0% of parents. Frequencies were not weighted. Reported p-values are from binary logistic regression models that determined if each reason differed by parents’ preferred language.