Table 4.
Fungal richness and diversity indices of the five French soils used
| Number of genera | OTUs (95% of similarity) | Shannon | Evenness | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | GnS | 116.00 (± 11.43) 1 | 350.33 (± 42.32) 1,2 | 3.72 (± 0.05) 1,2 | 0.64 (± 0.01) 1,2 |
| ISO | 92.33 (± 15.69) 1 | 273.67 (± 63.67) 1 | 3.31 (± 0.33) 1 | 0.59 (± 0.04) 1,2 | |
| ISOm | 118.67 (± 9.67) 1 | 340.67 (± 68.23) 1,2 | 3.73 (± 0.15) 1,2 | 0.64 (± 0.01) 1,2 | |
| E | GnS | 128.00 (± 13.74) 1 | 287.33 (± 30.58) 1 | 3.39 (± 0.08) 1,2 | 0.6 (± 0.01) 1,2 |
| ISO | 108.33 (± 9.81) 1 | 239.33 (± 31.54) 1 | 3.34 (± 0.22) 1 | 0.61 (± 0.03) 1,2 | |
| ISOm | 125.67 (± 6.55) 1 | 289 (± 33.66) 1 | 3.54 (± 0.18) 1,2 | 0.63 (± 0.02) 1,2 | |
| F | GnS | 129.67 (± 8.34) 1 | 249.67 (± 11.15) 1 | 2.98 (± 0.05) 1 | 0.54 (± 0.01) 1 |
| ISO | 136.00 (± 7.79) 2 | 312 (± 35.36) 1 | 3.19 (± 0.12) 1 | 0.56 (± 0.01) 1 | |
| ISOm | 140.33 (± 10.14) 1 | 267 (± 24.91) 1 | 3.27 (± 0.18) 1 | 0.59 (± 0.03) 1 | |
| L | GnS | 127.33 (± 9.29) a.1 | 416.33 (± 89.46) 2 | 4.05 (± 0.21) 2 | 0.67 (± 0.01) 2 |
| ISO | 89.67 (± 5.79) b.1 | 353.33 (± 51.45) 1 | 3.89 (± 0.09) 1 | 0.66 (± 0.03) 1,2 | |
| ISOm | 129.00 (± 6.48) a.1 | 382.33 (± 71.82) 2 | 3.74 (± 0.49) 2 | 0.63 (± 0.06) 2 | |
| R | GnS | 141.33 (± 13.82) 1 | 407.33 (± 84.94) 2 | 3.9 (± 0.2) 1,2 | 0.65 (± 0.01) 1,2 |
| ISO | 111.00 (± 11.00) 1,2 | 399.00 (± 30.00) 2 | 4.14 (± 0.01) 1 | 0.69 (± 0.01) 2 | |
| ISOm | 135.00 (± 12.68) 1 | 407 (± 67.38) 2 | 3.94 (± 0.12) 1,2 | 0.66 (± 0.01) 1,2 | |
The means were calculated with three replicates per soil (C, E, F, L and R) and procedure (ISO, ISOm and GnS-GII), and the standard errors of the means are indicated in parentheses. Significant differences between procedures for the same soil are indicated by letters (a, b), and significant differences between soils for the same procedure are indicated with numbers (1 – 1,2 – 2).