Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):140–147. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11785

TABLE 2.

Mean Scores of Depiction of Anatomic Detail on 2D Fast-Spin Echo (FSE) Images Versus Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Selective (MAVRIC SL) Images for 25 Matched Image Sets

Imaging Plane and
Anatomy Assessed
Mean Score of Depiction of Anatomic Detail ( ± SD)
p a
2D FSE MAVRIC SL

Coronal (n = 13)
 Hip joint capsule
  Reviewer 1 1.15 ± 0.38 2.31 ± 0.75 0.0010b
  Reviewer 2 1.08 ± 0.28 2.77 ± 0.44 0.0002b
 Gluteus medius
  Reviewer 1 2.31 ± 0.95 2.85 ± 0.38 0.1094
  Reviewer 2 1.92 ± 0.49 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0005b
 Gluteus minimus
  Reviewer 1 2.08 ± 0.95 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0156
  Reviewer 2 1.92 ± 0.49 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0005b
 Obturator externus
  Reviewer 1 1.08 ± 0.28 2.15 ± 0.99 0.0078b
  Reviewer 2 1.38 ± 0.51 2.38 ± 0.51 0.0010b
Axial (n = 12)
 Hip joint capsule
  Reviewer 1 1.22 ± 0.78 2.50 ± 0.80 0.0078b
  Reviewer 2 1.17 ± 0.58 2.5 ± 0.52 0.0010b
 Gluteus medius
  Reviewer 1 2.00 ± 0.95 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0156
  Reviewer 2 1.67 ± 0.49 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0005b
 Gluteus minimus
  Reviewer 1 1.92 ± 0.90 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0078b
  Reviewer 2 1.67 ± 0.49 3.00 ± 0.00 0.0005b
 Iliopsoas
  Reviewer 1 1.25 ± 0.62 2.33 ± 0.78 0.0078b
  Reviewer 2 1.08 ± 0.29 2.42 ± 0.51 0.0005b

Note—The depiction of anatomic detail was evaluated by two reviewers on a 3-point scale from 1 (well depicted) to 3 (not visualized).

a

After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p < 0.0125 shows a statistically significant difference.

b

Statistically significant difference.