Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 24;385(9965):351–361. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61183-1

Table.

Baseline data for participants without diabetes in 20 large statin trials

Number of patients (statin vs control) Treatment (active vs control) Follow-up (years) Trial population Age (years) Diabetes diagnostic criteria* Weight change data available Absolute LDL cholesterol lowering at 1 year (%) Number of cases of type 2 diabetes on statin (or intensive statin) Number of cases of type 2 diabetes on control (or low-dose statin)
4S (1994) 4242 (2116 vs 2126) S 10–40 mg vs placebo 5·2 Angina or previous MI 59 I, II, III Yes −1·77 (−37%) 198 193
WOSCOPS (1995) 5974 (2999 vs 2975) P 40 mg vs placebo 4·8 Male, hypercholesterolaemia, no history of MI 55 II, III Yes −1·07 (−24%) 75 93
AFCAPS TexCAPS (1998) 6211 (3094 vs 3117) L 20–40 mg vs placebo 5·2 Average cholesterol concentrations, no CVD 58 I, II, III Yes −0·94 (−27%) 72 74
LIPID (1998) 6997 (3496 vs 3501) P 40 mg vs placebo 5·9 Hospital admission for unstable angina or previous MI 62 II, III Yes −1·03 (−25%) 126 138
GISSI-Prevenzione (2000) 3460 (1743 vs 1717) P 20 mg vs standard care 1·9 Recent MI 59 III Yes −0·35 (−12%) 96 105
LIPS (2001) 1475 (724 vs 751) F 80 mg vs placebo 3·9 Recent percutaneous coronary intervention 60 I No −0·92 (−27%) 17 14
HPS (2002) 14 573 (7291 vs 7282) S 40 mg vs placebo 5·0 CVD or diabetes 65 I, II No −1·29 (−29%) 335 293
PROSPER (2002) 5023 (2510 vs 2513) P 40 mg vs placebo 3·2 Age 70–82 years with CVD or risk factors 75 II, III Yes −1·04 (−31%) 165 127
ALLHAT-LLT (2002) 6087 (3017 vs 3070) P 40 mg vs no treatment 4·8 CHD or CHD risk factors 66 III No −0·54 (−18%) 238 212
ASCOT-LLA (2003) 7773 (3910 vs 3863) A 10 mg vs placebo 3·3 Hypertension, no CHD 63 IV Yes −1·07 (−35%) 154 134
PROVE-IT TIMI 22 (2004) 3395 (1707 vs 1688) A 80 mg vs P 40 mg 2·0 Recent hospital admission for ACS 58 I, II, III Yes −0·65 (−22%) 101 99
A to Z (2004) 3504 (1768 vs 1736) S 40–80 mg vs Placebo −S 20 mg 2·0 Recent hospital admission for ACS 60 I, II No −0·30 (−15%) 65 47
TNT (2005) 7595 (3798 vs 3797) A 80 mg vs A 10 mg 5·0 Stable CHD 61 I, II, III Yes −0·62 (−22%) 418 358
IDEAL (2005) 7461 (3737 vs 3724) A 80 mg vs S 20–40 mg 4·8 Previous MI 62 I, II, III Yes −0·55 (−16%) 240 209
SPARCL (2006) 3803 (1905 vs 1898) A 80 mg vs placebo 4·4 Recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack 63 I, II, III§ Yes −1·43 (−42%) 166 115
MEGA (2006) 6086 (3013 vs 3073) P 10–20 mg vs no treatment 5·3 Hypercholesterolaemia, no previous CHD or stroke 58 I, II, III Yes −0·67 (−17%) 172 164
CORONA (2007) 3534 (1771 vs 1763) R 10 mg vs placebo 2·5 Systolic heart failure 73 I Yes −1·63 (−45%) 100 88
JUPITER (2008) 17 802 (8901 vs 8901) R 20 mg vs placebo 1·9 No CVD, no diabetes, hsCRP ≥2·0 mg/L 66 I, II Yes −1·09 (−50%) 270 216
GISSI-HF (2008) 3378 (1660 vs 1718) R 10 mg vs placebo 3·6 Chronic heart failure 67 III Yes −0·92 (−35%) 225 215
SEARCH (2010) 10 797 (5398 vs 5399) S 80 mg vs S 20 mg 6·7 Previous MI 64 I No −0·39 (−12%) 625 587
Total 129 170 (64 558 vs 64 612) .. 4·2 (1·6) .. .. .. .. .. 3858 3481

A=atorvastatin. CHD=coronary heart disease. CVD=cardiovascular disease. F=fluvastatin. L=lovastatin. P=pravastatin. MI=myocardial infarction. R=rosuvastatin. S=simvastatin.

*

Diagnostic criteria: I=adverse event report or physician report; II=glucose lowering therapy; III=raised fasting plasma glucose (≥7·0 mmol/L) on at least one occasion.

Change in lipid values at 1 year except for SPARCL (average difference during trial) and CORONA (difference at 3 months).

Median values.

§

Included criterion that diagnostic raised fasting plasma glucose must be at least 2·0 mmol/L higher than baseline glucose.