Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 4;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0287-3

Table 5.

Divergence times and effective migration rates estimated using a coalescent approach from the mitochondrial control region data (MDIV software)

Location KAZ vs. T (μ = 0.057) M T (μ = 0.0325)
Great lake Source EDW 7.0 (0–14.2) 6.312 (1.080) 12.3 (0–25)
Great lake Source GEO 4.5 (0–10.2) 7.671 (0.216) 7.9 (0–17.7)
Crater lake North BUG 49.0 (42.3 - 55.7) 0.009 (0.006) 85.9 (74.1 - 97.7)
Crater lake North CHI 82.6 (79.5 - 85.7) 0.008 (0.006) 144.9 (139.2 - 150.6)
Crater lake North KAB 46.6 (41.5 - 51.7) 0.025 (0.034) 81.8 (73–90.6)
Crater lake Central KAT 94.3 (90.3 - 98.2) 0.003 (0.001) 165.4 (158.3 - 172.5)
Crater lake South KAM 56.8 (53.3 - 60.3) 0.009 (0.006) 99.6 (93.5 - 105.7)
Crater lake South KAW 44.5 (37.2 - 51.8) 0.989 (0.076) 78.1 (65.6 - 90.6)
Crater lake South MAF 60.5 (51.4 - 69.1) 0.009 (0.007) 106.2 (90.9 - 121.5)
Crater lake South RWI 43.1 (34.3 - 51.9) 0.251 (0.018) 75.6 (60.3 - 90.9)
Crater lake South NKU 47.6 (39–56.2) 0.004 (0.001) 83.4 (68.3 - 98.5)
Group 1 North CHI + BUG + KAB 71.5 (62.6 - 80.4) 0.0006 (0.0004) 125.4 (109.8 - 141)
Group 2 Central KAT + MIR 89.0 (75.8 - 102.2) 0.002 (0.001) 156.1 (133–179.2)
Group 3 South Southern craters 54.4 (50.5 - 58.3) 0.687 (0.049) 95.4 (88.6 - 102.2)

Estimates are based on four independent runs. T in thousands of years (95% confidence interval), M = 2 Ne m. Group 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the different mitochondrial lineages suggested from Figure 3.