Table 4.
Effect estimatesa |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haplotype | N | P | OR | 95% CI | Effect modificationb | |
Haplotype 1 | 0.036 | |||||
0 copies | 239 | 0.001 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 | |
1/2 copies | 782 | 0.045 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
Haplotype 2 | 0.098 | |||||
0 copies | 805 | <0.001 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | |
1/2 copies | 216 | 0.85 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
Haplotype 3 | 0.43 | |||||
0 copies | 719 | 0.072 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
1/2 copies | 302 | <0.001 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 | |
Haplotype 4 | 0.58 | |||||
0 copies | 809 | 0.004 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | |
1/2 copies | 212 | 0.025 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 | |
Haplotype 5 | 0.054 | |||||
0 copies | 894 | 0.006 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
1/2 copies | 127 | 0.082 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | |
Haplotypes 1 and 2 | 0.010 | |||||
0 and 0 copies | 140 | 0.001 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 4.8 | |
0 and 1/2 copies | 99 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.4 | |
1/2 and 0 copies | 665 | 0.040 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | |
1/2 and 1/2 copies | 117 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.8 | 1.2 | |
Haplotypes 1 and 4 | 0.020 | |||||
0 and 0 copies | 139 | 0.012 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.2 | |
0 and 1/2 copies | 100 | 0.014 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2.0 | |
1/2 and 0 copies | 670 | 0.041 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
1/2 and 1/2 copies | 112 | 0.79 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | |
Haplotypes 2 and 4 | 0.26 | |||||
0 and 0 copies | 618 | 0.003 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | |
0 and 1/2 copies | 187 | 0.006 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | |
1/2 and 0 copies | 191 | 0.52 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | |
1/2 and 1/2 copiesc | 25 |
CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, N = number of individuals.
Model included life time arsenic concentration (per 10 µg/L increase), skin complexion, skin response to 1-hr midday sun, age, gender, education, and county.
A separate model that included all individuals provided the P value for the effect modification (the interaction term haplotype × life time arsenic concentration).
Too few individuals to conduct any analyses.