Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;56(1):60–69. doi: 10.1002/em.21896

Table 4.

Association Between Lifetime Arsenic Concentration and Risk of Basal Cell Carcinoma, Stratified for Haplotype (Logistic Regression)

Effect estimatesa
Haplotype N P OR 95% CI Effect modificationb
Haplotype 1 0.036
 0 copies 239 0.001 1.4 1.1 1.8
 1/2 copies 782 0.045 1.1 1.0 1.2
Haplotype 2 0.098
 0 copies 805 <0.001 1.2 1.1 1.4
 1/2 copies 216 0.85 1.0 0.9 1.2
Haplotype 3 0.43
 0 copies 719 0.072 1.1 1.0 1.2
 1/2 copies 302 <0.001 1.4 1.2 1.8
Haplotype 4 0.58
 0 copies 809 0.004 1.2 1.1 1.3
 1/2 copies 212 0.025 1.3 1.0 1.6
Haplotype 5 0.054
 0 copies 894 0.006 1.1 1.0 1.2
 1/2 copies 127 0.082 1.3 1.0 1.8
Haplotypes 1 and 2 0.010
 0 and 0 copies 140 0.001 2.7 1.5 4.8
 0 and 1/2 copies 99 0.99 1.0 0.7 1.4
 1/2 and 0 copies 665 0.040 1.1 1.0 1.3
 1/2 and 1/2 copies 117 0.95 0.99 0.8 1.2
Haplotypes 1 and 4 0.020
 0 and 0 copies 139 0.012 1.6 1.1 2.2
 0 and 1/2 copies 100 0.014 1.5 1.1 2.0
 1/2 and 0 copies 670 0.041 1.1 1.0 1.2
 1/2 and 1/2 copies 112 0.79 1.1 0.7 1.6
Haplotypes 2 and 4 0.26
 0 and 0 copies 618 0.003 1.2 1.1 1.3
 0 and 1/2 copies 187 0.006 1.5 1.1 1.9
 1/2 and 0 copies 191 0.52 1.1 0.9 1.3
 1/2 and 1/2 copiesc 25

CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, N = number of individuals.

a

Model included life time arsenic concentration (per 10 µg/L increase), skin complexion, skin response to 1-hr midday sun, age, gender, education, and county.

b

A separate model that included all individuals provided the P value for the effect modification (the interaction term haplotype × life time arsenic concentration).

c

Too few individuals to conduct any analyses.