Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 10;2:4. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00004

Table 7.

Studies based on data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database in an attempt to define the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Author Inclusion N Inclusion criteria Statistical methods Significant covariates for OS/DSS RT
Porter (132) 1973–2001 1226 surgery 428 surgery with RT (85.5% of RT postop) Age ≥18 Logistic regression (use of RT) Adjuvant radiotherapy use varies significantly with age, race, and geographical location
Nathan (133) 1988–2005 1365 Curative intent surgery Cox regression Age, sex, grade, histology Unadjusted Cox analysis: HR for OS 0.78–1.15
Zhou (134) 1988–2005 1574 Age ≥18 Cox regression Stratified for AJCC stage Surgery, age, sex, stage Stage I: HR for OS 0.25–0.96 Stage II/III: HR for OS 0.58–1.06
Tseng (135) 1988–2004 1130 surgery 373 surgery with RT (80.4% of RT postop) Age ≥18 Patients underwent surgery Cox regression Age, sex, histology, grade Complete resection Cox regression: HR for OS 0.78–1.09 overall OS benefit in MFH (P = 0.002) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (P = 0.08) in univariate analysis
Choi (136) 1988–2006 558 surgery 204 surgery with RT (80% of RT postop) Age ≥20, single malignancy Curative intent surgery Cox regression; propensity score matching Age, sex, grade, stage Cox regression: HR for DSS 0.87–1.56 After PS matching: no difference in DSS (P = 0.35) or OS (P = 0.1)

OS, overall survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; HR, hazard ratio; MFH, malignant fibrous hstiocytoma; PS, propensity score.