Table 6 . Results of logistic regression analysis for factors influencing the decision to purchase health insurance .
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
β | S.E. | Exp(B) | β | S.E. | Exp(B) | β | S.E. | Exp(B) | |
Socio-economic Variable | |||||||||
Age (years) | -0.11*** | 0.02 | 0.89 | -0.11*** | 0.02 | 0.89 | -0.11*** | 0.02 | 0.89 |
Marital Status (ref-single) | -0.83 | 0.67 | 0.43 | -0.98 | 0.72 | 0.38 | -1.14 | 0.80 | 0.32 |
Dependent Members | |||||||||
0–2 (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2–4 | -0.26 | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.34 | 0.75 | 0.71 | -0.39 | 0.81 | 0.67 |
4–6 | -1.19* | 0.65 | 0.30 | -1.49** | 0.72 | 0.22 | -1.54** | 0.77 | 0.22 |
>6 | -3.19*** | 0.87 | 0.04 | -3.49*** | 0.98 | 0.03 | -3.87** | 1.06 | 0.02 |
Education | |||||||||
Graduate (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Postgraduate | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.95 | -0.14 | 0.47 | 0.87 | 0.19 | 0.52 | 0.81 |
Medical expenditure | |||||||||
<2000 (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2000–5000 | 0.82* | 0.54 | 2.27 | 0.74 | 0.52 | 2.10 | 0.83 | 0.50 | 2.23 |
5000–10000 | 0.99* | 0.55 | 2.69 | 1.01* | 0.58 | 2.73 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 2.08 |
>10000 | 2.32*** | 0.62 | 10.16 | 2.04*** | 0.63 | 7.66 | 2.34*** | 0.67 | 10.41 |
Health status | |||||||||
Very good/good (ref) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Fair | 0.73* | 0.40 | 2.06 | 0.79* | 0.42 | 2.20 | 0.72* | 0.43 | 2.06 |
Very poor | -0.30 | 0.47 | 0.74 | -0.40 | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.37 | 0.54 | 0.69 |
Perception about Health Insurance product | |||||||||
Subscribing a policy will not benefit me (ref= agree) | 0.98** | 0.41 | 2.66 | 0.99** | 0.42 | 2.70 | |||
It will not reduce my medical expenditure (ref= agree) | 1.21** | 1.21 | 3.35 | 1.24*** | 0.46 | 3.46 | |||
I find product condition too complex (ref= agree) | 0.25 | 0.42 | 1.28 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 1.48 | |||
Companies creates lots of hassles during claims (ref= disagree) | -0.55 | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.213 | 0.46 | 0.81 | |||
Individuals’ personal behavioral factors | |||||||||
Does my job thoroughly (ref= agreed) | 0.21 | 0.47 | 1.23 | ||||||
Gets nervous easily (ref= disagree) | 1.64*** | 0.48 | 5.17 | ||||||
Number of observations (n) | 263 | 263 | 263 | ||||||
2 Log likelihood (χ2) | 250.79a | 237.67a | 224.66a | ||||||
Nagelkerke R 2 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.52 | ||||||
Cox and Snell R2 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
aLog likelihood at P= 0.01; ***P≤ 0.001; **P≤ 0.05; *P≤ 0.10. Dependent variable= Insurance status (insured and uninsured)