Table 1.
Eye-movement parameter | U-test | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Young (SD) | Old (SD) | Z-value | p-value | Effect-Size (AUC) | |||
Task I (walking with free gaze) | median saccade amplitude [°] | 4.14 (1.31) | 3.25 (1.07) | 1.894 | 0.058 | 0.692 [0.513 0.871] | |
median saccade peak-velocity [°/s] | 285.6 (51.4) | 220.2 (24.2) | 3.789 | 0.0002 | 0.882 [0.764 1.000] | ||
median saccade mean-velocity [°/s] | 199.2 (29.1) | 168.3 (17.8) | 3.134 | 0.0017 | 0.817 [0.671 0.962] | ||
median q-value | 1.40 (0.06) | 1.31 (0.06) | 3.479 | 0.0005 | 0.851 [0.719 0.984] | ||
main-sequence fit K-value | 185.0 (24.7) | 154.4 (22.8) | 3.169 | 0.0015 | 0.820 [0.676 0.965] | ||
main-sequence fit L-value | 0.335 (0.04) | 0.359 (0.08) | −0.689 | 0.491 | 0.429 [0.235 0.624] | ||
mean saccade frequency [1/s] | 3.03 (1.37) | 1.83 (1.04) | 2.582 | 0.010 | 0.761 [0.598 0.924] | ||
mean freeviewing-gain | 1.31 (0.31) | 1.56 (0.29) | −2.224 | 0.026 | 0.259 [0.077 0.441] | ||
mean blink rate [1/s] | 0.474 (0.32) | 0.801 (0.57) | −1.826 | 0.068 | 0.315 [0.135 0.495] | ||
median saccade peak-velocity [°/s] for certain saccade amplitudes | 1°–2° (22.5%) | 202.9 (35.1) | 187.4 (37.1) | 2.032 | 0.042 | 0.706 [0.530 0.882] | |
2°–3° (11.5%) | 244.3 (52.9) | 207.9 (28.1) | 2.342 | 0.019 | 0.737 [0.568 0.906] | ||
3°–5° (14.7%) | 251.6 (28.8) | 226.9 (18.6) | 2.962 | 0.003 | 0.799 [0.648 0.951] | ||
5°–8° (14.6%) | 317.0 (34.8) | 283.0 (24.9) | 2.997 | 0.003 | 0.803 [0.652 0.953] | ||
8°–15° (15.3%) | 413.6 (37.0) | 363.9 (41.5) | 2.514 | 0.012 | 0.855 [0.722 0.988] | ||
Task II (tracking targets) | mean tracking-gain tracking RMSE | 0.957 (0.13) | 0.865 (0.22) | 1.264 | 0.206 | 0.643 [0.436 0.850] | |
16.99 (6.97) | 17.80 (4.90) | −0.680 | 0.497 | 0.417 [0.190 0.643] |
Computed eye-movement parameters of the two tasks (Task I and II) and their corresponding statistics. The percentage behind each saccade amplitude window reflects the prevalence of a saccade of that particular amplitude. The distinct analysis of amplitude ranges of more than 15° could not be evaluated reliably, because some participants did not perform sufficient saccades within this domain.