Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Medchemcomm. 2014 Oct 15;6(1):192–201. doi: 10.1039/C4MD00223G

Table 1.

IC50 of lithocholic acid amphiphiles againt three colon cancer cell lines, HCT-116, DLD-1 and HCT-8.a

Amphiphile HCT-116 (μM) DLD-1 (μM) HCT-8 (μM) HPLC, RTb (min)
LCA 81.1 ± 3.8 173.1 ± 3.0 97.4 ± 2.5 -c
LCA-AMM1 36.7 ± 3.4 29.4 ± 2.3 30.7 ± 6.9 -d
LCA-PPZ1 102.0 ± 4.3 118.4 ± 4.5 114.6 ± 4.1 -d
LCA-MOR1 89.0 ± 2.7 176.2 ± 3.8 120.9 ± 3.4 24.17
LCA-TMOR1 87.3 ± 3.1 163.2 ± 2.7 130.5 ± 4.1 28.63
LCA-TMA1 38.1 ± 2.9 53.0 ± 1.0 37.0 ± 2.3 7.94
LCA-PYRO1 17.8 ± 2.4 17.0 ± 4.6 36.4 ± 2.9 8.23
LCA-PIP1 11.7 ± 3.0 13.7 ± 1.0 14.7 ± 3.0 8.12
LCA-PYR1 26.5 ± 2.0 35.4 ± 2.8 35.4 ± 4.3 7.84
LCA-DMAP1 13.2 ± 3.0 17.0 ± 2.9 59.1 ± 4.5 7.90
LCA-DABCO1 60.7 ± 1.2 46.4 ± 2.9 76.4 ± 5.9 7.98
a

IC50 values were calculated from MTT experiments

b

Mobile phase for all amphiphiles was AcCN:MeOH (95:5) except for LCA-MOR1 and LCA-TMOR1, where mobile phase was AcCN. LCA-MOR1 and LCA-TMOR1 stock solutions were made in 10% EtOAc in AcCN.

c

not determined

d

could not be determined as this amphiphile is soluble in DMSO only.