Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2012 Oct 22;87(5):685–700. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.035

Table 3.

Evidence regarding risk of pregnancy or ovulation after vaginal ring dosing errors

Reference, sources of
support
Study population Study design/intervention Definition of adherence/
dosing error
Outcome Results Strengths Weaknesses Quality
Nondeliberate extension
of the RFI
  Bjarnadottir et al.,
2002 [28]
121 women using
NuvaRing for 635
cycles, ages 18–40,
multiple centers
in 5 European
countries
Prospective comparative
analysis (adherent versus
nonadherent cycles) of data
from 1 RCT and 2
nonrandomized trials;
NuvaRing users followed
for 6 cycles of standard
usea ; FU after cycles 3
and 6 or at premature
discontinuation
  • -

    Period of ring use did not deviate >48 h from scheduled 21 days × 24 h, and RFI did not deviate >24 h from the scheduled 7 days × 24 h

Pregnancy: tested
via urine if pregnancy
suspected during
study and via serum
test for β-hCG at
end of study
No pregnancies in 635
cycles reported despite
RFI extended >24 h
from scheduled period
in 3.5% of cycles
(~22)
  • -

    Large sample

  • -

    Pregnancy measurement described

  • -

    Adherence tracked on diary cards

  • -

    Multiple centers

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    Details on length of extended RFI not reported nor # of cycles with other types of dosing errors

II-2, poor,
direct
  Dieben et al., 2002 [30]
(Some data also
reported in Roumen
et al., 2001 [36] and
Roumen et al.,
2002 [37])
    NV Organon
2322 women using
NuvaRing for 23,
298 cycles, mean
age 28.2, multiple
centers in Europe,
Canada, USA
Prospective comparative
analysis (adherent versus
nonadherent cycles) of
data collected from 2
noncomparative studies;
NuvaRing users followed
for 13 cycles; FU occurred
during 1st week after cycles
3, 6, 9 and 13 months
postinitiation of standard usea
  • -

    Same as above

  • -

    Shortened RFIs imply duration <6 days; extended RFIs imply duration >8 days

Same as Bjarnadottir
et al., 2002 [28]
14.4% of users (~3355
cycles) were
nonadherent; 4.8% of
users (~1118 cycles)
had extended RFI; 11
pregnancies among
nonadherent women
(11/3355 cycles,
0.33%): 1 had 11-day
RFI, 1 had 14-day RFI,
9 had 2+ consecutive
days without ring use
during ring-use period
or misunderstood
proper use. 10
pregnancies among
adherent women
(10/19,943 cycles,
0.05%)
  • -

    Large sample

  • -

    Adherence tracked on diary cards and interactive voice recording systems

  • -

    Multiple centers

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    Pregnancy rates not reported separately for different types of dosing errors (unable to calculate since # of cycles with different dosing errors not known)

II-2, poor,
direct
  Ahrendt et al., 2006 [27]
    Oragon
499 women, mean
age 26.6, multiple
centers in 10
European countries
Prospective comparative
analysis (adherent versus
nonadherent cycles) of
data collected from 1 RCT;
NuvaRing users followed
for 13 cycles of standard usea
Same as Bjarnadottir
et al., 2002 [28]
Same as Bjarnadottir
et al., 2002 [28]
No pregnancies
reported among
nonadherent
women despite RFI
extended >24 h from
scheduled period in
4.9% of cycles (3.6%
of cycles for >24–48 h
and 1.3% for >48 h); 1
pregnancy reported
among adherent women.
  • -

    Large sample

  • -

    Pregnancy measurement described

  • -

    Adherence tracked on diary cards

  • -

    Multiple centers

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    Details on # of adherent and nonadherent cycles not provided

II-2, poor
direct
  Brucker et al., 2008 [29]
    Organon
5823 women using
NuvaRing, median
age 29.4, Germany
Prospective noncomparative
study; FU visits at 3, 6
months postinitiation
of standard usea
  • -

    Definition of adherence not stated

Pregnancy — method
of measurement
not stated
7 pregnancies (0.12%
of users); 3 due to
nonadherence [extended
RFI in 2 and interruption
of ring use (timing and
duration not known) in
1]; 1 due to repeated ring
expulsion or loss;
3 unknown
  • -

    Large sample

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    No definition of adherence

  • -

    Adherence not systematically tracked

  • -

    Pregnancy measurement not described

  • -

    Limited information on nonadherence

  • -

    Single center

II-3, poor,
direct
Deliberate dosing errors
  Mulders and Dieben,
2001 [32]
    NV Organon
16 women, ages
18–35 years,
1 center,
Netherlands
Prospective noncomparative
analysis of data collected
from randomized crossover
study; NuvaRing use for 3
weeks extended by
additional 2 weeks, 2 groups,
NuvaRing use was either
pre- or proceeded by 1 cycle
of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg
desogestrel (n=8 for each
group). Ovarian ultrasound,
LH, FSH, estradiol and
progesterone measured
  • -

    Standard usea

  • -

    Extended ring use for additional 2 weeks simulates forgotten ring removal

Ovulation —
definition
not stated
  • -

    No ovulations in 16 cycles with dosing errors

  • -

    Follicular size remained small during the extended period of ring use

  • -

    Largest follicular diameters and highest concentrations of estradiol were during 1st week of ring use

  • -

    Adherence tracked on diary cards

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    Small sample

  • -

    No definition of ovulation

II-3,
poor,
indirect
  Mulders et al., 2002 [31]
    NV Organon
51 women, ages
18–35 years,
1 center,
Netherlands
PD study with 3-group
randomization: (a)
NuvaRing standard usea
for cycle 1, use for 21-days
with extended RFI until
ovulation for cycle 2
(n=15); (b) NuvaRing
standard usea for cycle 1,
use for 3 days with extended
RFI until ovulation for cycle
2 (n=15); (c) NuvaRing use
for 21 days with extended
RFI until 13-mm follicle
detected by ultrasound, followed by standard usea
for cycle 2 (n=15),
  • -

    Criteria not provided, but adherence was determined by number of hours of ring use per day

Ovulation —
definition
not stated
Median time to
ovulation was 19
(Group 1) and 17 (Group
2) days after ring
removal (cycle 2), with
1st ovulation after 13
(Group 1) and 12 (Group
2) days; median time to
develop 13-mm follicle
(cycle 1) for Group 3
was 11 days (range 8–21
days); 50% of women
needed extension of RFI
≥4 days. Ring insertion
after extended RFI for
Group 3 interfered with
ovarian function
  • -

    Moderate sample

  • -

    Adherence tracked on diary cards

  • -

    Randomization procedures described

  • -

    Unclear if women had regular cycles

  • -

    Criteria for adherence not provided

  • -

    No definition of ovulation

  • -

    Single center

b

Abbreviations: FU=follow-up; PD=pharmacodynamic.

a

Standard use for vaginal ring defined as 21 days of ring use followed by 7-day ring-free interval.

b

Quality of pharmacodynamic studies not assessed.