Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 9;5(23):12428–12439. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2660

Table 5. Concordance of C228T mutation between tumor tissues and urine samples as determined using Sanger sequencing and castPCR.

Tumor tissues
UTUC Sanger Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 6 1 60% (26 – 88%*) 97% (86 – 100%) 89%
WT 4 36
Total 10 37
castPCR Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 9 3 90%(56 – 100%) 92% (78 – 98%) 94%
WT 1 34
Total 10 37
Tumor tissues
BC Sanger Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 17  0 47% (30 – 65%) 100% (89 –100%) 73%
WT 19 33
Total 36 33
castPCR Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 31 1 86% (67 – 94%) 97% (82 – 100%) 90%
WT 5 32
Total 36 33
Tumor tissues
UTUC + BC Sanger Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 23 1 50% (35 – 65%) 98% (92 – 100%) 76%
WT 23 69
Total 46 70
castPCR Mutant WT Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
Urine samples Mutant 40 3 89% (74 – 96%) 96% (88 – 99%) 91%
WT 6 67
Total 46 70

McNemar's Test for differences between Sanger sequencing and castPCR assays

Sensitivity: UTUC, P = 0.37; BC, P = 0.003; UTUC +BC: P < 0.001.

Specificity: UTUC, BC and UTUC + BC: P ≥ 0.48.

*95% confidence intervals.