Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12880-015-0042-7

Table 2.

Interrater reliability of 2D:4D measurements

Method Observer 1 Observer 2 TEM (%) SEE ICC (95% CI) Classification
mean 2D:4D (SD) mean 2D:4D (SD)
X-ray 0.905 (0.020) 0.904 (0.020) 0.001 0.007 (0.9%) 0.010 0.94 (0.91-0.96) excellent
DXA 0.908 (0.019) 0.907 (0.020) 0.001 0.009 (1.2%) 0.010 0.90 (0.86-0.94) excellent

Note: Interrater reliability for both observers. = difference; TEM = technical error of measurement, absolut and in % of the mean. SEE = standard error of estimate; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficients; CI = confidence intervall; classification according to Rosner (2011). ICCs < 0.7 were considered non-acceptable, 0.71 < ICCs < 0.79 were acceptable, 0.80 < ICCs < 0.89 were very good and ICCs >0.90 were excellent.