Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Behaviour. 2012 Jan 1;149(13-14):1339–1365. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003019

Table 5.

Test for significance of random effects of the models for bites at a male intruder, N = 31 (number of fixed effects parameters = 3).

AIC Log(L) Cov P Test Component tested χ2,* df p
1 1386.99 −691.49 2
2 1370.22 −682.11 3 1 vs. 2 Intercept 18.76 1 <0.0001
3 1367.32 679.66 4 2 vs. 3 Slope 4.90 1 0.0268
4 1368.14 −679.07 5 3 vs. 4 COVI,S 1.18 1 0.2778

AIC, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC); log(L), log likelihood; Cov P, the number of covariance parameters; df, degrees of freedom. The final model is indicated in bold.

*

Log-likelihood ratio tests.

Model 1 includes the final fixed effects structure with no random effects. Model 2 contains the same fixed effects as model 1 with random intercepts. Model 3 contains the same fixed and random effects as model 2 with random slopes. Model 4 contains the same fixed and random effects as model 3, allowing for nonzero covariance between intercepts (I) and slopes for time (S).