Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;5:13. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00013

Table 2.

BACTH analysis of hetero-oligomerization of the Inc proteins.

Bait protein T25 fusion MWa (Da) Developmental expressionb Prey protein T18 fusion
Ct005 39537 early Ct005, IncA, IncF
Ct058 40072 Mid IncD
Ct101 17645 Mid NO
Ct115 incD 14912 early IncD, Ct058, Ct222
Ct116 incE 13539 early NO
Ct117 incF 10420 early IncF, IncA, IncC, IncD, IncG, Ct005, Ct058, Ct249, Ct850
Ct118 incG 17389 early IncD
Ct119 incA 30313 Mid IncA, IncC, IncD, IncF, Ct005
Ct134 15104 NT NO
Ct135 38477 early NO
Ct222 13915 Mid Ct222, IncD, Ct223, Ct224, Ct850
Ct223 29475 Mid Ct223
Ct225 13264 Mid Ct225
Ct227 14155 Mid NO
Ct229 23422 early IncD, Ct222, Ct223
Ct232 incB 12237 early NO
Ct233 incC 18418 early IncC, IncA
Ct249 12210 early Ct249, IncF
Ct813 29570 Mid Ct813
Ct850 45822 Mid IncF, Ct222

The interactions identified with the BACTH system are listed in this table. All Inc proteins were fused to the C-terminus of T25 or T18. An interaction corresponds at a β-galactosidase activity of the DHT1 bacteria at least 5 times superior to the negative control (see Table S5). NO means that we did not find any blue clones (no interaction detected) on the plate. The homotypic interactions are in bold.

a

Deduced from protein sequence.

b

Developmental expression pattern as deduced from qPCR analysis.