Comparison 6. PRT versus aerobic training.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Main function measure (higher score = better function)	4	125	Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	‐0.21 [‐0.56, 0.15]
2 Main function measure (lower score = better function)	1		Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
3 Main lower limb strength measure	10	487	Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.44 [0.08, 0.80]
4 VO2 max (ml/kg.min)	8	423	Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	‐1.13 [‐2.63, 0.38]
5 Six minute walk test (meters)	2	63	Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	‐4.28 [‐48.24, 39.67]
6 Gait speed (m/s)	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
7 Pain (lower score = less pain)	1		Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected