Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Parkhouse 2000.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: no 
 Participant blinding: no 
 Loss to Follow‐up: not reported 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: Canada 
 N = 22 
 Sample: sedentary older women with low bone mineral density 
 Age: mean 68.1 years 
 Inclusion criteria: community‐dwelling, sedentary, post‐menopausal women, aged 60‐80 years, low bone mineral density 
 Exclusion criteria: medical or orthopaedic problems that would interfere with their ability to participate in physical activity, on hormone replacement
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 9 LL 
 Equipment: not reported 
 Intensity: 75‐80% of 1RM 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: 8‐10/3 
 Program Duration: 8 months 
 Setting: gym 
 Supervision: not reported 
 Adherence: not reported 
 2. Control Group: not reported
Outcomes Strength (1RM) 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear