Reeves 2004.

Methods	RCT Method of randomisation: not reported Assessor blinding: not reported Participant blinding: not reported Loss to follow‐up: 0 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not reported Post‐program follow up: no
Participants	Location: UK N = 18 (9 in each group) Sample: physically active volunteers Age: mean 74.3 years (SD = 3.5) Inclusion criteria: no neurological or musculoskeletal disorder that might prevent participation Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions	PRT versus control 1. PRT Type of Ex: 2UL/2LL Equipment: Technogym machines Intensity: 80% of 5 RM Frequency: Ex3 Reps/Sets: 10/2 Duration: 14 weeks Setting: not reported Supervision: full Adherence: 93% 2. Control Group: to keep normal activity level
Outcomes	Muscle strength Comments on adverse events: no
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Allocation concealment?	Unclear risk	B ‐ Unclear