Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Sousa 2005.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: not reported 
 Participant blinding: not reported 
 Loss to follow‐up: 0 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: NA 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: Portugal 
 N = 20 (10 in each group) 
 Sample: healthy men 
 Age: mean 73 years (SD = 6) 
 Inclusion criteria: family physician's approval 
 Exclusion criteria: taking medications that could affect balance, smokers, history of falls, and orthopedic, neurological, cardiac, or pulmonary problems
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 4UL/3LL 
 Equipment: Image Sport Machines 
 Intensity: increased progressively from 50% to 80% of 1RM over the program 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: first 8 weeks: 8‐12/2‐3; then 6‐10/2‐3 
 Duration: 14 weeks 
 Setting: not reported‐gym? 
 Supervision: not reported 
 Adherence: 95% 
 2. Control Group: not reported
Outcomes Primary: self‐reported disability 
 Secondary: Muscle strength (1 RM), TUAG, functional reach test 
 Comment on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear