Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Adami 1999 Not a RCT
Adams 2001 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Agre 1988 Not a RCT
Alexander 2003 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Aniansson 1981 Not a RCT
Annesi 2004 Combined intervention program ‐ not PRT alone
Ardman 1998 Not a RCT
Ballard 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Barbosa 2002 Not a RCT
Baum 2003b Does not meet criteria for PRT
Bean 2002 Does not meet criteria for PRT
Bellew 2003 Not a RCT
Beniamini 1997 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Beniamini 1999 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Berg 1998 Not a RCT
Bernard 1999 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Bilodeau 2000 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Binda 2003 Does not meet for criteria for PRT
Binder 2002 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Boardley 2007 No relevant outcomes to the review
Braith 2005 No relevant outcomes to the review
Brandon 2003b Does not meet the criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Brandon 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Brill 1998 Not a RCT
Brose 2003 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Brown 1990 Not a RCT
Brown 1991 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Brown 2000 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Bunout 2001 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Campbell 2002 No relevant outcomes to the review
Campbell 2004 No relevant outcomes to the review
Cancela 2003 Article cannot be located.
Candow 2004 Combined program (with supplement) ‐ not PRT alone
Capodaglio 2002 Not a RCT
Carter 2002 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Carter 2005 Included participants younger than 60
Carvalho 2002 No relevant outcomes to the review
Cauza 2005 No relevant outcomes to the review
Cauza 2005b Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Chaloupka 2000 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Chetlin 2004 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Chiba 2006 Not a RCT
Chien 2005 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Connelly 1995 Not a RCT
Connelly 2000 Not a RCT
Cramp 2006 Not a RCT
Cress 1991 Not a RCT
Cress 1999 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Daepp 2006 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Daly 2005 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
de Bruin 2007 No relevant comparisons to the review
de Vito 1999 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
DeBolt 2004 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Delagardelle 2002 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Delecluse 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
DeVito 2003 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Dibble 2006 Not a RCT
Dibble 2006b Not a RCT
Dunstan 2002 Not PRT alone ‐ with eating plan
Dunstan 2005 Not PRT alone ‐ with eating plan
Dupler 1993 Not a RCT
Fernandez Ramirez 99 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Ferrara 2006 Not a RCT
Ferri 2003 Not a RCT
Fiatarone 1990 Not a RCT
Fisher 1991 Not a RCT
Forte 2003 Not a RCT
Frontera 1988 Not a RCT
Frontera 1990 Not a RCT
Galvao 2006 Not a RCT
Grimby 1992 Not a RCT
Gur 2002 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Hageman 2002 Not a RCT
Hakkinen 1999 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Hameed 2004 Combined program (with hormone intervention)
Hartard 1996 Not a RCT
Haub 2002 Combined program (protein) ‐ not PRT alone
Heiwe 2005 No relevant outcomes to the review
Henwood 2006 Does not meet the criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Hess 2005 Not a RCT
Hess 2006 Not a RCT
Hirsch 2003 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Host 2007 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Huggett 2004 No relevant outcomes to the review
Hughes 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Humphries 2000 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Hung 2004 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Hunter 1995 Not a RCT
Hunter 2002 Not a RCT
Ibanez 2005 Not a RCT
Ivey 2000 Not a RCT
Johansen 2006 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Jones 1987 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Judge 2005 No relevant outcomes to the review
Katula 2006 Not a RCT
Kerr 2001 No relevant outcomes to the review
Kolbe‐Alexander 2006 Not a RCT
Komatireddy 1997 Participants too young (mean age <60)
La Forge 2002 No relevant outcomes to the review
Labarque 2002 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Lambert 2002 No relevant outcomes to the review
Lambert 2003 Combined program (with hormone) ‐ not PRT alone
Lamotte 2005 No relevant outcomes to the review
Levinger 2005 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Lexell 1992 Not a RCT
Lexell 1995 Not a RCT (not clearly stated that patients were randomised)
Littbrand 2006 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Liu 2004 Training did not meet criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Liu‐Ambrose 2004 No relevant outcomes to the review
Loeppky 2005 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Lohman 1995 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Maddalozzo 2000 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Magnusson 1996 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Marcora 2005 Not a RCT
Martin Ginis 2006 No relevant comparisons to the review
McCool 1991 Not a RCT
McMurdo 1994 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Mobily 2004 Not a RCT
Morey 1989 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Morey 1991 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Morse 2005 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Narici 1989 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Nelson 1997 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Ochala 2005 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Ohira 2006 Training did not meet criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive/included young participants
Oka 2000 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Okawa 2004 Included younger participants (middle age)
Okumiya 1996 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Panton 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Parsons 1992 Not a RCT
Perhonen 1992 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Perkins 1961 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Perrig‐Chiello 1998 No relevant outcomes to the review
Petrella 2000 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Phillips 2004 Not a RCT
Pyka 1994 Serious threats to internal validity ‐ participants allowed to move from exercise to control group‐Not a RCT
Rabelo 2004 Training did not meet criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Ramsbottom 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Reeves 2004b Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Reeves 2005 Not a RCT
Reeves 2006 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Richards 1996 Not a RCT
Roman 1993 Not a RCT
Rooks 1997 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Salli 2006 Training did not meet criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Sallinen 2006 Combined program (with diet) ‐ not PRT alone
Sanders 1998 Not a RCT
Sartorio 2001 No relevant outcomes to the review
Sauvage 1992 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Sayers 2003 Not a RCT
Schott 2006 Combined program (with supplement) ‐ not PRT alone
Sharp 1997 Not a RCT
Shaw 1998 Not a RCT
Sherrington 1997 Training did not meet criteria for PRT
Signorile 2005 Does not meet the criteria for PRT ‐ not progressive
Sinaki 1996 Participants too young (mean age <60)
Sipila 1994 Not a RCT
Spruit 2002 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Sullivan 2001 Not a RCT
Taaffe 1997 Not a RCT
Teixeira 2002 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Teixeira 2003 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Teixeira‐Salm. 2005 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Thielman 2004 No relevant outcomes to the review
Thomas 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Thomas 2005 Training did not meet criteria for PRT ‐ The resistance was not progressively increased
Thompson 1988 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Timonen 2002 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Timonen 2006 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Timonen 2006b Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Treuth 1994 Not a RCT
Trudelle‐Jack. 2004 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Tsuji 2000 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Vad 2002 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Vale 2003 Article cannot be identified
Valkeinen 2005 Participants too young (mean age of the control group < 60)
Van den Ende 2000 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Vanbiervliet 2003 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Veloso 2003 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Verfaillie 1997 Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Villareal 2003 Combined program (with hormone)‐not PRT alone
Villareal 2006b Combined program ‐ not PRT alone
Vincent 2002b No relevant outcomes to the review
Vincent 2003 No relevant outcomes to the review
Vincent 2006 Included young participants (younger than 60 years old)
Woo 2007 Training did not meet criteria for PRT. The resistance was not progressively increased
Yang 2006 Does not meet the criteria for PRT
Zion 2003 Not a RCT

RCT = randomised controlled trial; PRT = progressive resistance strength training