Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Ades 1996.

Methods RCT (randomised controlled trial) 
 Method of randomisation: unclear 
 Assessor blinding: no 
 Participant blinding: no 
 Loss to follow‐up: not reported 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: USA 
 N = 24 
 Sample: healthy, sedentary 
 Age: mean 70.4 years (SD 4) 
 Inclusion criteria: healthy, sedentary older people 
 Exclusion criteria: angina or electrocardiographic ischaemia during exercise test, resting BP >160/90, non‐cardiopulmonary limitation of exercise capacity (i.e. claudication, arthritis, cerebrovascular disease)
Interventions PRT (progressive resistance strength training) versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of exercises: 4 UL (upper limb), 3LL (lower limb) 
 Equipment: machines (Universal Gym) 
 Intensity: high (50‐80% of 1RM) 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/ sets: 8/3 
 Duration: 12 weeks 
 Setting: gym 
 Supervision: not reported 
 Adherence: not reported 
 2. Control Group: instructed not to alter their home activity habits
Outcomes Strength (1 repetition maximum) 
 Peak aerobic capacity 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear