Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Balagopal 2001.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: no 
 Participant blinding: no 
 Loss to follow‐up: not reported 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: USA 
 N = 20 
 Sample: healthy older people 
 Age: mean 71 years (SD 1) 
 Inclusion criteria: older people aged 65‐79, healthy (based on physical exam and blood tests) 
 Exclusion criteria: subjects who exercised regularly for > or = 2 days per week, women taking hormone replacement
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 4UL, 3LL 
 Equipment: resistance training machines 
 Intensity: 50‐80% 1RM 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/ sets: 8/3 
 Duration: 3 months 
 Setting: gym 
 Supervision: full 
 Adherence: not reported 
 2. Control Group: not reported
Outcomes Muscle strength (1RM) 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear