Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Bruunsgaard 2004.

Methods RCT 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: not reported 
 Participant blinding: not reported 
 Loss to follow‐up: 18 (39 enrolled) 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: Demark 
 N = 21 (10 in PRT) 
 Sample: frail nursing home residents 
 Age: mean 88.6 years‐PRT, 90.6 years‐control 
 Inclusion criteria: not reported 
 Exclusion criteria: acute illness, hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease, moderate/severe cognitive impairment, severe impairment of motor function, and neurological disorder
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 2 LL 
 Equipment: training chair (Quadriceps Exercise Table) 
 Intensity: 50% to 80% of 1 RM 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: 8/3 
 Duration: 12 weeks 
 Setting: nursing home facility (Gym?) 
 Supervision: full by a physiotherapist 
 Adherence: 84% for the PRT group, 97% for the control group 
 2. Control group: social activities, twice a week by an occupational therapist
Outcomes Muscle strength (1 RM) 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear