Fiatarone 1997.
| Methods | RCT Method of randomisation: not reported Assessor blinding: no Participant blinding: no, but control group received weekly phone calls Loss to follow‐up: 4 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no Post‐program follow up: no | |
| Participants | Location: USA N = 34 Sample: frail older people Age: mean 82 years Inclusion criteria: community dwelling older people, moderate to severe functional impairment Exclusion criteria: not reported | |
| Interventions | PRT versus control 1. PRT Type of Ex: 11 total to UL and LL Equipment: arm and leg weights Intensity: high Frequency: Ex3 Reps/Sets: not reported Program Duration: 16 weeks Setting: home‐based Supervision: low ‐ 2 weeks of home instruction, then phone calls Adherence: 90% 2. Control Group: weekly phone calls | |
| Outcomes | Strength Gait velocity Self‐reported activity level Attitude towards Ageing on the PGC Morale Scale Bed days Falls Health care visits Comments on adverse events: no | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |