Hagerman 2000.

Methods	RCT Method of randomisation: not reported Assessor blinding: no Participant blinding: no Loss to follow‐up: 4 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no Post‐program follow up: no
Participants	Location: USA N = 22 Sample: untrained but physically active older men Age: mean 63.7 years Inclusion criteria: male, aged 60‐75, physically active but not engaged in resistance training Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions	PRT versus control 1. PRT Type of Ex: 3 LL Equipment: machines Intensity: high (85‐90% of 1RM) Frequency: Ex2 Reps/Sets: 6‐8/3 Program Duration: 16 weeks Setting: gym Supervision: full Adherence: 100% 2. Control Group: not reported
Outcomes	Strength (1RM) Peak aerobic capacity Comments on adverse events: no
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Allocation concealment?	Unclear risk	B ‐ Unclear