Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2

Hennessey 2001.

Methods RCT trial with 4 groups: PRT alone, growth hormone treatment alone, PRT and growth hormone treatment and control. Only PRT alone and control are included in this review 
 Method of randomisation: not reported 
 Assessor blinding: no 
 Participant blinding: no 
 Loss to follow‐up: not reported 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: no 
 Post‐program follow up: no
Participants Location: USA 
 N = 16 in PRT and control 
 Sample: frail older people 
 Age: mean 71.3 years (SD 4.5) 
 Inclusion criteria: frail which was defined as scoring between 12 and 28 on Reuben's Physical Performance Test; 
 Exclusion criteria: medical conditions (cancer, heart disease, diabetes, recent fracture, carpal tunnel syndrome) that would interfere with administration of growth hormone or the performance of regular exercise 3 times per week; did not expect to spend a year in Rhode Island; their doctor convinced them not to participate for medical reasons or otherwise; unwilling to inject the drug and be randomised to exercise or no exercise
Interventions PRT versus control 
 1. PRT 
 Type of Ex: 11 exercises (UL & LL) 
 Equipment: ankle and wrist weights and exercise equipment 
 Intensity: increased from 20% to 95% of 1 RM‐most training was at high intensity 
 Frequency: Ex3 
 Reps/Sets: 8/3 
 Duration: 25 weeks 
 Setting: gym (in study facilities or local community centers) 
 Supervision: Full 
 Adherence: not reported 
 2. Control Group: not reported
Outcomes Strength (isokinetic dynamometry) 
 Physical Performance Test (PPT) 
 Comments on adverse events: no
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear